TOLZ vs. IYW
TOLZ (ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF) and IYW (iShares U.S. Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TOLZ is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index, while IYW is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TOLZ returned 7.50%/yr vs 24.38%/yr for IYW. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TOLZ charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IYW.
Performance
TOLZ vs. IYW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOLZ achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly lower than IYW's 19.29% return. Over the past 10 years, TOLZ has underperformed IYW with an annualized return of 7.50%, while IYW has yielded a comparatively higher 24.38% annualized return.
TOLZ
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 7.13%
- YTD
- 12.26%
- 1Y
- 15.76%
- 3Y*
- 14.11%
- 5Y*
- 8.83%
- 10Y*
- 7.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.71%
IYW
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- 6M
- 20.08%
- YTD
- 19.29%
- 1Y
- 34.47%
- 3Y*
- 28.25%
- 5Y*
- 18.55%
- 10Y*
- 24.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $125.49M | $126.55M | $189.91M | |
| $2.85M | $1.54M | $1.36M |
TOLZ vs. IYW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 12.26% | 14.76% | 11.67% | 6.18% | -4.25% | 20.47% | -9.46% | 26.84% | -7.90% | 13.28% |
IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF | 19.29% | 25.38% | 30.25% | 65.44% | -34.83% | 35.44% | 47.45% | 46.64% | -0.93% | 36.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOLZ and IYW is -0.14, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2014 | 0.41 |
The correlation between TOLZ and IYW shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOLZ vs. IYW — Risk / Return Rank
TOLZ
IYW
TOLZ vs. IYW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) and iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TOLZ | IYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.23 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 1.77 | +1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.87 | 5.23 | +3.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TOLZ vs. IYW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOLZ drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, smaller than the maximum IYW drawdown of -81.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOLZ and IYW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOLZ | IYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.33% | -81.90% | +42.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -17.81% | +12.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.26% | -26.47% | +17.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.85% | -39.44% | +17.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.33% | -39.44% | +0.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.30% | -8.40% | +6.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -34.48% | +27.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 6.03% | -4.17% |
Volatility
TOLZ vs. IYW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) is 3.58%, while iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) has a volatility of 7.86%. This indicates that TOLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IYW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOLZ | IYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 7.86% | -4.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.79% | 19.90% | -11.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.70% | 23.79% | -13.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.03% | 26.47% | -12.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 25.36% | -9.13% |
TOLZ vs. IYW - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOLZ has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than IYW's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOLZ vs. IYW - Dividend Comparison
TOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than IYW's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF | 0.11% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.34% | 0.50% | 0.31% | 0.56% | 0.72% | 0.92% | 0.82% | 1.14% | 1.12% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.97% | 3.99% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 3.16% | 2.96% | 3.63% | 3.30% | 2.62% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOLZ and IYW have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IYW has higher volatility (7.86%) compared to TOLZ (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOLZ dropped -39.33% vs IYW's -81.90%.
On 10-year performance, IYW leads with 24.38% vs 7.50% for TOLZ. On fees, IYW is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, TOLZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IYW has performed better with a 24.38% return vs 7.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYW is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for TOLZ.
TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 0.11% for IYW.
TOLZ is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while IYW is Technology Equities. TOLZ tracks Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index, while IYW tracks Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for TOLZ and 0.38% for IYW.
TOLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TOLZ and IYW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer