TOLZ vs. BITU
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU).
TOLZ and BITU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TOLZ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index. It was launched on Mar 25, 2014. BITU is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Apr 1, 2024. Both TOLZ and BITU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
TOLZ vs. BITU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TOLZ vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 11.27% | 14.76% | 11.36% |
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | -47.12% | -37.07% | 37.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOLZ achieves a 11.27% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -47.12% return.
TOLZ
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- YTD
- 11.27%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 18.59%
- 3Y*
- 13.80%
- 5Y*
- 10.31%
- 10Y*
- 8.41%
BITU
- 1D
- 3.93%
- 1M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- -47.12%
- 6M
- -71.69%
- 1Y
- -52.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TOLZ vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOLZ has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than BITU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TOLZ vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank
TOLZ
BITU
TOLZ vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TOLZ | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.44 | -0.58 | +2.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | -0.51 | +2.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.94 | +0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | -0.70 | +2.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.58 | -1.35 | +11.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TOLZ | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | -0.58 | +2.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | -0.33 | +0.74 |
Correlation
The correlation between TOLZ and BITU is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
TOLZ vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison
TOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, less than BITU's 78.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 3.66% | 3.99% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 3.16% | 2.96% | 3.63% | 3.30% | 2.62% | 3.67% |
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | 78.57% | 50.23% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TOLZ vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOLZ drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, smaller than the maximum BITU drawdown of -77.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOLZ and BITU.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOLZ | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.33% | -77.76% | +38.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | -77.76% | +68.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.16% | -76.35% | +73.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.70% | -31.27% | +24.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 40.22% | -38.43% |
Volatility
TOLZ vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) is 3.63%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 26.13%. This indicates that TOLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TOLZ | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 26.13% | -22.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.29% | 74.10% | -66.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.97% | 90.36% | -77.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 99.67% | -85.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 99.67% | -83.37% |