TOLZ vs. BILD
TOLZ (ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF) and BILD (Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF) are both Infrastructure Equities funds. TOLZ is passively managed, while BILD is actively managed. Over the past year, TOLZ returned 15.76% vs 16.75% for BILD. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TOLZ charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for BILD.
Performance
TOLZ vs. BILD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOLZ achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly higher than BILD's 10.49% return.
TOLZ
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 7.13%
- YTD
- 12.26%
- 1Y
- 15.76%
- 3Y*
- 14.11%
- 5Y*
- 8.83%
- 10Y*
- 7.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.71%
BILD
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- 6M
- 6.26%
- YTD
- 10.49%
- 1Y
- 16.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.91%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $632.99 | $26.02K | $12.55K | |
| $2.85M | $1.54M | $1.36M |
TOLZ vs. BILD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 12.26% | 14.76% | 11.67% | 3.35% |
BILD Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF | 10.49% | 21.08% | -2.68% | 3.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOLZ and BILD is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2023 | 0.83 |
The correlation between TOLZ and BILD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
TOLZ vs. BILD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TOLZ
BILD
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Energy
TOLZ
BILD
Utilities
TOLZ
BILD
Real Estate
TOLZ
BILD
Industrials
TOLZ
BILD
Consumer Defensive
TOLZ
BILD
-
Financial Services
TOLZ
BILD
Consumer Cyclical
TOLZ
BILD
-
Technology
TOLZ
BILD
-
Basic Materials
TOLZ
-
BILD
-
Communication Services
TOLZ
-
BILD
Healthcare
TOLZ
-
BILD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOLZ vs. BILD — Risk / Return Rank
TOLZ
BILD
TOLZ vs. BILD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) and Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TOLZ | BILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.29 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 2.98 | +0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.87 | 7.11 | +1.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TOLZ vs. BILD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOLZ drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, which is greater than BILD's maximum drawdown of -14.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOLZ and BILD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOLZ | BILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.33% | -14.78% | -24.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -6.05% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.30% | -2.17% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -3.68% | -2.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 2.53% | -0.67% |
Volatility
TOLZ vs. BILD - Volatility Comparison
ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD) at 3.28%. This indicates that TOLZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOLZ | BILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 3.28% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.79% | 9.08% | -0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.70% | 11.00% | -0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.03% | 13.08% | +0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 13.08% | +3.15% |
TOLZ vs. BILD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOLZ has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than BILD's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOLZ vs. BILD - Dividend Comparison
TOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, less than BILD's 4.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILD Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF | 4.67% | 3.05% | 5.53% | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.97% | 3.99% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 3.16% | 2.96% | 3.63% | 3.30% | 2.62% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOLZ and BILD have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TOLZ has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to BILD (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOLZ dropped -39.33% vs BILD's -14.78%.
On 1-year performance, BILD leads with 16.75% vs 15.76% for TOLZ. On fees, TOLZ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, BILD has been the lower-risk option at 3.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BILD has performed better with a 16.75% return vs 15.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TOLZ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for BILD.
BILD has the higher dividend yield at 4.67%, compared with 2.97% for TOLZ.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Macquarie. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for TOLZ and 0.49% for BILD.
BILD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TOLZ and BILD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer