PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOK vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TOK vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF (TOK) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOK achieves a 9.75% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 11.20% return. Over the past 10 years, TOK has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 13.60%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.05% annualized return.


TOK

1D
-0.80%
1M
4.53%
YTD
9.75%
6M
10.43%
1Y
25.70%
3Y*
20.98%
5Y*
12.18%
10Y*
13.60%

VTI

1D
-0.72%
1M
4.99%
YTD
11.20%
6M
11.09%
1Y
28.18%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOK vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TOK
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF
9.75%20.83%19.52%24.76%-17.93%23.84%15.06%30.05%-7.83%22.09%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
11.20%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between TOK and VTI is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2007

0.83

The correlation between TOK and VTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (all time) to 0.97 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TOK vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TOK
VTI

Technology

31.3%
33.5%

Financial Services

14.9%
12.0%

Industrials

9.8%
9.8%

Communication Services

9.0%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
10.0%

Healthcare

8.7%
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
4.7%

Energy

4.0%
3.7%

Basic Materials

3.2%
2.0%

Utilities

2.8%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.7%
2.4%

Technology

TOK
31.3%
VTI
33.5%

Financial Services

TOK
14.9%
VTI
12.0%

Industrials

TOK
9.8%
VTI
9.8%

Communication Services

TOK
9.0%
VTI
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

TOK
9.0%
VTI
10.0%

Healthcare

TOK
8.7%
VTI
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

TOK
5.2%
VTI
4.7%

Energy

TOK
4.0%
VTI
3.7%

Basic Materials

TOK
3.2%
VTI
2.0%

Utilities

TOK
2.8%
VTI
2.3%

Real Estate

TOK
1.7%
VTI
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOK vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOK
TOK Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOK Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
TOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOK Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOK vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF (TOK) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TOKVTIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.16

2.33

-0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.03

3.18

-0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.42

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

3.17

-0.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.07

14.62

-1.55

TOK vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOK Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOK and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TOKVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

2.33

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.73

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.82

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.51

-0.07

Drawdowns

TOK vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOK drawdown since its inception was -56.18%, roughly equal to the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOK and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOKVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.18%

-55.45%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.07%

-8.92%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.23%

-19.30%

+3.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.86%

-25.36%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.82%

-35.00%

+0.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-0.72%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.52%

-8.03%

-0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

1.93%

+0.04%

Volatility

TOK vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF (TOK) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 2.96%. This indicates that TOK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOKVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

2.96%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.36%

9.13%

+0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.94%

12.17%

-0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.93%

17.40%

-1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.15%

18.30%

-1.15%

TOK vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOK has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TOK vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

TOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than VTI's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TOK
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF
1.25%1.37%1.66%1.95%3.55%1.66%1.52%2.12%2.74%2.60%2.56%3.02%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, TOK and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TOK has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to VTI (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOK dropped -56.18% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.05% vs 13.60% for TOK. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.05% return vs 13.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for TOK.

TOK has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 1.01% for VTI.

TOK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. TOK tracks MSCI Kokusai Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TOK and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOK and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer