PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOK vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TOK vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF (TOK) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOK achieves a 9.94% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 28.00% return. Over the past 10 years, TOK has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 13.34%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 16.52% annualized return.


TOK

1D
0.27%
1M
1.30%
6M
8.07%
YTD
9.94%
1Y
20.44%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
11.80%
10Y*
13.34%

MTUM

1D
1.63%
1M
-1.32%
6M
23.75%
YTD
28.00%
1Y
34.62%
3Y*
31.08%
5Y*
14.59%
10Y*
16.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOK vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TOK
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF
9.94%20.83%19.52%24.76%-17.93%23.84%15.06%30.05%-7.83%22.09%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
28.00%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-1.67%37.50%

Correlation

The correlation between TOK and MTUM is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013

0.76

The correlation between TOK and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

TOK vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TOK
MTUM

Technology

30.3%
50.2%

Financial Services

15.9%
5.0%

Industrials

10.3%
15.0%

Healthcare

9.6%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
2.9%

Communication Services

8.2%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
3.7%

Energy

3.8%
10.5%

Basic Materials

3.2%
2.3%

Utilities

3.0%
0.6%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.3%

Technology

TOK
30.3%
MTUM
50.2%

Financial Services

TOK
15.9%
MTUM
5.0%

Industrials

TOK
10.3%
MTUM
15.0%

Healthcare

TOK
9.6%
MTUM
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

TOK
8.6%
MTUM
2.9%

Communication Services

TOK
8.2%
MTUM
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

TOK
5.1%
MTUM
3.7%

Energy

TOK
3.8%
MTUM
10.5%

Basic Materials

TOK
3.2%
MTUM
2.3%

Utilities

TOK
3.0%
MTUM
0.6%

Real Estate

TOK
1.7%
MTUM
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOK vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOK
TOK Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
TOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOK Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
TOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOK Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOK vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF (TOK) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TOKMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.27

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

3.01

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.95

10.29

-0.33

TOK vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOK Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOK and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TOK vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOK drawdown since its inception was -56.18%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOK and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOKMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.18%

-34.08%

-22.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.07%

-11.54%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.23%

-20.99%

+4.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.86%

-32.28%

+6.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.82%

-34.08%

-0.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-7.38%

+6.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.48%

-6.19%

-2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

3.37%

-1.31%

Volatility

TOK vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF (TOK) is 3.06%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 12.47%. This indicates that TOK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOKMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

12.47%

-9.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.10%

21.55%

-11.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.41%

23.81%

-11.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.02%

21.55%

-5.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.06%

21.52%

-4.46%

TOK vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOK has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TOK vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

TOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, more than MTUM's 0.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.58%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%
TOK
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF
1.31%1.37%1.66%1.95%3.55%1.66%1.52%2.12%2.74%2.60%2.56%3.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


TOK and MTUM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (12.47%) compared to TOK (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOK dropped -56.18% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 16.52% vs 13.34% for TOK. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TOK has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 16.52% return vs 13.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for TOK.

TOK has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.58% for MTUM.

TOK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. TOK tracks MSCI Kokusai Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TOK and 0.15% for MTUM.

TOK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOK and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer