PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOK vs. MFUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TOK vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF (TOK) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOK achieves a 9.75% return, which is significantly lower than MFUS's 16.37% return.


TOK

1D
-0.80%
1M
4.53%
YTD
9.75%
6M
10.43%
1Y
25.70%
3Y*
20.98%
5Y*
12.18%
10Y*
13.60%

MFUS

1D
0.03%
1M
5.72%
YTD
16.37%
6M
16.58%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.25%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOK vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TOK
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF
9.75%20.83%19.52%24.76%-17.93%23.84%15.06%30.05%-7.83%6.91%
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
16.37%16.02%20.17%12.19%-5.82%24.10%10.64%26.17%-7.30%11.20%

Correlation

The correlation between TOK and MFUS is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017

0.85

The correlation between TOK and MFUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

TOK vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TOK
MFUS

Technology

31.3%
21.8%

Financial Services

14.9%
12.6%

Industrials

9.8%
12.6%

Communication Services

9.0%
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
10.6%

Healthcare

8.7%
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
10.3%

Energy

4.0%
7.0%

Basic Materials

3.2%
2.8%

Utilities

2.8%
1.7%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.8%

Technology

TOK
31.3%
MFUS
21.8%

Financial Services

TOK
14.9%
MFUS
12.6%

Industrials

TOK
9.8%
MFUS
12.6%

Communication Services

TOK
9.0%
MFUS
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

TOK
9.0%
MFUS
10.6%

Healthcare

TOK
8.7%
MFUS
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

TOK
5.2%
MFUS
10.3%

Energy

TOK
4.0%
MFUS
7.0%

Basic Materials

TOK
3.2%
MFUS
2.8%

Utilities

TOK
2.8%
MFUS
1.7%

Real Estate

TOK
1.7%
MFUS
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOK vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOK
TOK Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOK Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
TOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOK Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

MFUS
MFUS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
MFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOK vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF (TOK) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TOKMFUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.16

2.63

-0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.03

3.77

-0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.47

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

4.41

-1.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.07

18.13

-5.06

TOK vs. MFUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOK Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the MFUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOK and MFUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TOKMFUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

2.63

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.86

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.79

-0.36

Drawdowns

TOK vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOK drawdown since its inception was -56.18%, which is greater than MFUS's maximum drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOK and MFUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOKMFUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.18%

-35.21%

-20.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.07%

-6.39%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.23%

-15.39%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.86%

-18.22%

-7.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

0.00%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.52%

-4.00%

-4.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

1.55%

+0.42%

Volatility

TOK vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF (TOK) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) have volatilities of 3.23% and 3.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOKMFUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

3.19%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.36%

8.22%

+1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.94%

10.72%

+1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.93%

15.03%

+0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.15%

17.35%

-0.20%

TOK vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOK has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

TOK vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison

TOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than MFUS's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
1.36%1.54%1.45%1.96%2.07%1.35%1.72%1.89%1.69%1.01%0.00%0.00%
TOK
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF
1.25%1.37%1.66%1.95%3.55%1.66%1.52%2.12%2.74%2.60%2.56%3.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


TOK and MFUS have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TOK has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to MFUS (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOK dropped -56.18% vs MFUS's -35.21%.

On 5-year performance, MFUS leads with 12.82% vs 12.18% for TOK. On fees, TOK is cheaper at 0.25% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MFUS has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 12.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TOK is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MFUS.

MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.25% for TOK.

TOK tracks MSCI Kokusai Index, while MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index​. They also come from different issuers: iShares and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TOK and 0.30% for MFUS.

MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOK and MFUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer