PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOK vs. IQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TOK vs. IQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF (TOK) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TOK vs. IQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TOK
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF
-2.66%20.83%19.52%24.76%-17.93%23.84%25.18%
IQM
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
3.20%30.76%31.03%41.06%-33.36%25.18%78.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOK achieves a -2.66% return, which is significantly lower than IQM's 3.20% return.


TOK

1D
0.93%
1M
-4.43%
YTD
-2.66%
6M
-0.07%
1Y
19.53%
3Y*
17.32%
5Y*
10.79%
10Y*
12.52%

IQM

1D
1.99%
1M
-3.98%
YTD
3.20%
6M
2.05%
1Y
57.05%
3Y*
26.96%
5Y*
15.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TOK vs. IQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOK has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IQM's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TOK vs. IQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOK
TOK Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOK Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
TOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOK Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

IQM
IQM Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOK vs. IQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF (TOK) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TOKIQMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.21

1.72

-0.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.67

2.33

-0.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.33

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

4.00

-2.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.05

12.47

-4.42

TOK vs. IQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOK Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the IQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOK and IQM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TOKIQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

1.72

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.54

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.78

-0.38

Correlation

The correlation between TOK and IQM is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TOK vs. IQM - Dividend Comparison

TOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, while IQM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TOK
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF
1.41%1.37%1.66%1.95%3.55%1.66%1.52%2.12%2.74%2.60%2.56%3.02%
IQM
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TOK vs. IQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOK drawdown since its inception was -56.18%, which is greater than IQM's maximum drawdown of -44.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOK and IQM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TOKIQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.18%

-44.91%

-11.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.83%

-14.71%

+3.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.86%

-44.91%

+19.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.56%

-6.86%

+1.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.59%

-12.55%

+3.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

4.72%

-2.27%

Volatility

TOK vs. IQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF (TOK) is 5.58%, while Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) has a volatility of 12.71%. This indicates that TOK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TOKIQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.58%

12.71%

-7.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.42%

23.53%

-14.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.24%

33.40%

-17.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.92%

28.67%

-12.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.13%

30.73%

-13.60%