TOGA vs. SDIV
TOGA (Tremblant Global ETF) and SDIV (Global X SuperDividend ETF) are both Global Equities funds. TOGA is actively managed, while SDIV is passively managed. Over the past year, TOGA returned -9.65% vs 25.09% for SDIV. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TOGA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for SDIV.
Performance
TOGA vs. SDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOGA achieves a -13.57% return, which is significantly lower than SDIV's 5.97% return.
TOGA
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- -13.57%
- 6M
- -12.39%
- 1Y
- -9.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDIV
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- YTD
- 5.97%
- 6M
- 6.19%
- 1Y
- 25.09%
- 3Y*
- 15.75%
- 5Y*
- -0.84%
- 10Y*
- -0.07%
TOGA vs. SDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TOGA Tremblant Global ETF | -13.57% | 14.13% | 17.42% |
SDIV Global X SuperDividend ETF | 5.97% | 29.12% | 0.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOGA and SDIV is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2024 | 0.46 |
TOGA vs. SDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TOGA
SDIV
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
TOGA
SDIV
Technology
TOGA
SDIV
Communication Services
TOGA
SDIV
Financial Services
TOGA
SDIV
Real Estate
TOGA
SDIV
Basic Materials
TOGA
-
SDIV
Consumer Defensive
TOGA
-
SDIV
Energy
TOGA
-
SDIV
Healthcare
TOGA
-
SDIV
Industrials
TOGA
-
SDIV
Utilities
TOGA
-
SDIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOGA vs. SDIV — Risk / Return Rank
TOGA
SDIV
TOGA vs. SDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tremblant Global ETF (TOGA) and Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TOGA | SDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.35 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 3.43 | -3.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.77 | 12.41 | -13.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TOGA | SDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.47 | 2.02 | -2.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.06 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
TOGA vs. SDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOGA drawdown since its inception was -28.50%, smaller than the maximum SDIV drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOGA and SDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOGA | SDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.50% | -56.90% | +28.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.50% | -7.35% | -21.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.93% | -17.77% | -1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.43% | -18.59% | +12.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.54% | 2.03% | +10.51% |
Volatility
TOGA vs. SDIV - Volatility Comparison
Tremblant Global ETF (TOGA) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) at 4.21%. This indicates that TOGA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOGA | SDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 4.21% | +1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.38% | 9.64% | +6.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.63% | 12.47% | +8.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.02% | 16.86% | +4.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.02% | 18.97% | +2.05% |
TOGA vs. SDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOGA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than SDIV's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOGA vs. SDIV - Dividend Comparison
TOGA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDIV Global X SuperDividend ETF | 10.02% | 9.59% | 11.33% | 11.73% | 14.17% | 8.95% | 7.96% | 8.73% | 9.22% | 6.66% | 6.95% | 7.33% |
TOGA Tremblant Global ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOGA and SDIV have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TOGA has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to SDIV (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOGA dropped -28.50% vs SDIV's -56.90%.
On 1-year performance, SDIV leads with 25.09% vs -9.65% for TOGA. On fees, SDIV is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, SDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SDIV has performed better with a 25.09% return vs -9.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SDIV is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for TOGA.
SDIV has the higher dividend yield at 10.02%, compared with 0.00% for TOGA.
They also come from different issuers: Tremblant Advisors and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TOGA and 0.58% for SDIV.
SDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TOGA and SDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer