TOGA vs. IOO
TOGA (Tremblant Global ETF) and IOO (iShares Global 100 ETF) are both Global Equities funds. TOGA is actively managed, while IOO is passively managed. Over the past year, TOGA returned -9.65% vs 38.24% for IOO. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TOGA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IOO.
Performance
TOGA vs. IOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOGA achieves a -13.57% return, which is significantly lower than IOO's 12.26% return.
TOGA
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- -13.57%
- 6M
- -12.39%
- 1Y
- -9.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IOO
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- 12.26%
- 6M
- 12.43%
- 1Y
- 38.24%
- 3Y*
- 25.48%
- 5Y*
- 16.68%
- 10Y*
- 16.70%
TOGA vs. IOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TOGA Tremblant Global ETF | -13.57% | 14.13% | 17.42% |
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 12.26% | 27.02% | 13.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOGA and IOO is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2024 | 0.61 |
The correlation between TOGA and IOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
TOGA vs. IOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TOGA
IOO
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
TOGA
IOO
Technology
TOGA
IOO
Communication Services
TOGA
IOO
Financial Services
TOGA
IOO
Real Estate
TOGA
IOO
Basic Materials
TOGA
-
IOO
Consumer Defensive
TOGA
-
IOO
Energy
TOGA
-
IOO
Healthcare
TOGA
-
IOO
Industrials
TOGA
-
IOO
Utilities
TOGA
-
IOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOGA vs. IOO — Risk / Return Rank
TOGA
IOO
TOGA vs. IOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tremblant Global ETF (TOGA) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TOGA | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.50 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 3.87 | -4.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.77 | 17.94 | -18.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TOGA | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.47 | 2.84 | -3.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.39 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
TOGA vs. IOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOGA drawdown since its inception was -28.50%, smaller than the maximum IOO drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOGA and IOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOGA | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.50% | -55.85% | +27.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.50% | -9.94% | -18.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.93% | -1.33% | -17.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.43% | -11.27% | +4.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.54% | 2.14% | +10.40% |
Volatility
TOGA vs. IOO - Volatility Comparison
Tremblant Global ETF (TOGA) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) at 3.81%. This indicates that TOGA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOGA | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 3.81% | +1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.38% | 10.59% | +5.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.63% | 13.54% | +7.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.02% | 17.04% | +3.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.02% | 17.78% | +3.24% |
TOGA vs. IOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOGA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than IOO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOGA vs. IOO - Dividend Comparison
TOGA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 0.82% | 0.92% | 1.08% | 1.49% | 2.00% | 1.53% | 1.49% | 2.02% | 2.54% | 2.23% | 2.75% | 2.89% |
TOGA Tremblant Global ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOGA and IOO have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TOGA has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to IOO (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOGA dropped -28.50% vs IOO's -55.85%.
On 1-year performance, IOO leads with 38.24% vs -9.65% for TOGA. On fees, IOO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, IOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IOO has performed better with a 38.24% return vs -9.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IOO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for TOGA.
IOO has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.00% for TOGA.
They also come from different issuers: Tremblant Advisors and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TOGA and 0.40% for IOO.
IOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TOGA and IOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer