TOGA vs. GVAL
TOGA (Tremblant Global ETF) and GVAL (Cambria Global Value ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TOGA returned -11.25% vs 43.62% for GVAL. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TOGA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for GVAL.
Performance
TOGA vs. GVAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOGA achieves a -13.46% return, which is significantly lower than GVAL's 17.40% return.
TOGA
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- -13.46%
- 6M
- -14.10%
- 1Y
- -11.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GVAL
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- 17.40%
- 6M
- 17.33%
- 1Y
- 43.62%
- 3Y*
- 27.44%
- 5Y*
- 14.14%
- 10Y*
- 11.81%
TOGA vs. GVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TOGA Tremblant Global ETF | -13.46% | 14.13% | 17.44% |
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 17.40% | 55.87% | -0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOGA and GVAL is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2024 | 0.40 |
TOGA vs. GVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TOGA
GVAL
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
Real Estate
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
TOGA
GVAL
Communication Services
TOGA
GVAL
Technology
TOGA
GVAL
Financial Services
TOGA
GVAL
Real Estate
TOGA
GVAL
Industrials
TOGA
GVAL
Basic Materials
TOGA
-
GVAL
Consumer Defensive
TOGA
-
GVAL
Energy
TOGA
-
GVAL
Healthcare
TOGA
-
GVAL
-
Utilities
TOGA
-
GVAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOGA vs. GVAL — Risk / Return Rank
TOGA
GVAL
TOGA vs. GVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tremblant Global ETF (TOGA) and Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TOGA | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.50 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | 3.81 | -4.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | 14.52 | -15.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TOGA vs. GVAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOGA drawdown since its inception was -28.50%, smaller than the maximum GVAL drawdown of -46.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOGA and GVAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOGA | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.50% | -46.82% | +18.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.50% | -11.50% | -17.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.83% | -2.31% | -16.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.71% | -13.82% | +7.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.21% | 3.01% | +10.20% |
Volatility
TOGA vs. GVAL - Volatility Comparison
Tremblant Global ETF (TOGA) has a higher volatility of 7.40% compared to Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) at 6.37%. This indicates that TOGA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOGA | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.40% | 6.37% | +1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.19% | 13.81% | +3.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.10% | 15.55% | +5.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.11% | 18.60% | +2.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.11% | 19.00% | +2.11% |
TOGA vs. GVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOGA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than GVAL's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOGA vs. GVAL - Dividend Comparison
TOGA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 2.43% | 2.93% | 4.75% | 6.12% | 5.05% | 2.97% | 1.90% | 2.84% | 4.65% | 2.00% | 2.54% | 2.11% |
TOGA Tremblant Global ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOGA and GVAL have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TOGA has higher volatility (7.40%) compared to GVAL (6.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOGA dropped -28.50% vs GVAL's -46.82%.
On 1-year performance, GVAL leads with 43.62% vs -11.25% for TOGA. On fees, GVAL is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, GVAL has been the lower-risk option at 6.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GVAL has performed better with a 43.62% return vs -11.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GVAL is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for TOGA.
GVAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.43%, compared with 0.00% for TOGA.
They also come from different issuers: Tremblant Advisors and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TOGA and 0.64% for GVAL.
GVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TOGA and GVAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer