TOGA vs. BPH
TOGA (Tremblant Global ETF) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TOGA is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Tremblant, while BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian. Both are actively managed. Their -0.50 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. TOGA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.
Performance
TOGA vs. BPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TOGA
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -5.93%
- 6M
- -6.47%
- YTD
- -12.47%
- 1Y
- -10.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.39%
BPH
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- 18.84%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $53.46K | $52.99K | $51.54K | |
| $69.62K | $58.16K | $201.80K |
TOGA vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TOGA Tremblant Global ETF | 2.17% |
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | 5.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOGA and BPH is -0.50, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | -0.50 |
TOGA vs. BPH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TOGA
BPH
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
TOGA
BPH
-
Technology
TOGA
BPH
-
Communication Services
TOGA
BPH
-
Financial Services
TOGA
BPH
-
Real Estate
TOGA
BPH
-
Industrials
TOGA
BPH
-
Basic Materials
TOGA
-
BPH
-
Consumer Defensive
TOGA
-
BPH
-
Energy
TOGA
-
BPH
Healthcare
TOGA
-
BPH
-
Utilities
TOGA
-
BPH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOGA vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank
TOGA
BPH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TOGA vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tremblant Global ETF (TOGA) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TOGA | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TOGA vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOGA drawdown since its inception was -28.50%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOGA and BPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOGA | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.50% | -15.58% | -12.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.90% | 0.00% | -17.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.15% | -5.64% | -1.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.18% | — | — |
Volatility
TOGA vs. BPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOGA | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.00% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.74% | 28.58% | -6.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.10% | 28.58% | -7.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.10% | 28.58% | -7.48% |
TOGA vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOGA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOGA vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison
TOGA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | 0.48% |
TOGA Tremblant Global ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOGA and BPH have a correlation of -0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for TOGA.
BPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.00% for TOGA.
TOGA is categorized as Global Equities, while BPH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tremblant and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TOGA and 0.19% for BPH.
Find the right allocation for TOGA and BPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer