TOELY vs. LRCX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Tokyo Electron ADR (TOELY) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX).

Performance

TOELY vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tokyo Electron ADR (TOELY) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TOELY vs. LRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TOELY Tokyo Electron ADR	10.01%	49.57%	-14.19%	82.22%	-49.18%	53.76%	71.31%	94.00%	-38.01%	94.67%
LRCX Lam Research Corporation	24.97%	139.16%	-6.84%	88.63%	-40.72%	53.66%	64.18%	119.33%	-24.40%	76.21%

Fundamentals

Market Cap TOELY : $112.48B LRCX : $270.39B
EPS TOELY : $549.72 LRCX : $4.89
PE Ratio TOELY : 0.22 LRCX : 43.69
PEG Ratio TOELY : 0.01 LRCX : 3.31
PS Ratio TOELY : 0.05 LRCX : 13.20
PB Ratio TOELY : 0.06 LRCX : 26.65
Total Revenue (TTM) TOELY : $2.40T LRCX : $20.56B
Gross Profit (TTM) TOELY : $1.09T LRCX : $10.24B
EBITDA (TTM) TOELY : $722.18B LRCX : $7.43B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOELY achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly lower than LRCX's 24.97% return. Over the past 10 years, TOELY has underperformed LRCX with an annualized return of 28.69%, while LRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 40.32% annualized return.

TOELY

• 1D: 4.72%
• 1M: -13.55%
• YTD: 10.01%
• 6M: 36.41%
• 1Y: 78.55%
• 3Y*: 28.34%
• 5Y*: 10.66%
• 10Y*: 28.69%

LRCX

• 1D: 6.87%
• 1M: -8.54%
• YTD: 24.97%
• 6M: 60.02%
• 1Y: 196.05%
• 3Y*: 60.68%
• 5Y*: 28.66%
• 10Y*: 40.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TOELY vs. LRCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOELY

TOELY Risk / Return Rank: 82
TOELY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
TOELY Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
TOELY Omega Ratio Rank: 79
TOELY Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
TOELY Martin Ratio Rank: 82

LRCX

LRCX Risk / Return Rank: 97
LRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
LRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
LRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
LRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
LRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOELY vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tokyo Electron ADR (TOELY) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TOELY	LRCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	3.67	-2.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	3.58	-1.55
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.50	-0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.51	9.82	-7.31
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.49	31.04	-24.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TOELY vs. LRCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOELY Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the LRCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOELY and LRCX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TOELY	LRCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57	3.67	-2.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25	0.63	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74	0.92	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.41	-0.27

Correlation

The correlation between TOELY and LRCX is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

TOELY vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison

TOELY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TOELY Tokyo Electron ADR	0.00%	1.02%	1.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.11%	2.27%	0.00%
LRCX Lam Research Corporation	0.47%	0.57%	1.19%	0.95%	1.53%	0.78%	1.04%	1.54%	2.79%	1.01%	1.28%	1.36%

Drawdowns

TOELY vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOELY drawdown since its inception was -92.92%, which is greater than LRCX's maximum drawdown of -87.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOELY and LRCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TOELY	LRCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.92%	-87.90%	-5.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.30%	-20.01%	-10.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.40%	-56.39%	-3.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.40%	-56.39%	-3.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.12%	-14.26%	-4.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.12%	-28.31%	-21.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.71%	6.33%	+5.38%

Volatility

TOELY vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tokyo Electron ADR (TOELY) is 18.23%, while Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a volatility of 20.58%. This indicates that TOELY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TOELY	LRCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.23%	20.58%	-2.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.32%	40.44%	-4.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.49%	53.75%	-3.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.57%	45.53%	-1.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.85%	44.09%	-5.24%

Financials

TOELY vs. LRCX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tokyo Electron ADR and Lam Research Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TOELY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tokyo Electron ADR reported a gross profit of 240.09B and revenue of 562.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.7%.

LRCX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.65B and revenue of 5.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.6%.

TOELY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tokyo Electron ADR reported an operating income of 118.24B and revenue of 562.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.

LRCX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 1.81B and revenue of 5.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.9%.

TOELY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tokyo Electron ADR reported a net income of 120.68B and revenue of 562.01B, resulting in a net margin of 21.5%.

LRCX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 1.59B and revenue of 5.34B, resulting in a net margin of 29.8%.