TOAK vs. GKAT
TOAK (Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF) and GKAT (Scharf Global Opportunity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TOAK is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Twin Oak, while GKAT is a Global Equities fund managed by Scharf Investments. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TOAK charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for GKAT.
Performance
TOAK vs. GKAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOAK achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than GKAT's 10.47% return.
TOAK
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- 3.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GKAT
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 10.47%
- 6M
- 13.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOAK vs. GKAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TOAK Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF | 1.32% | 1.45% |
GKAT Scharf Global Opportunity ETF | 10.47% | 6.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOAK and GKAT is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2025 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOAK vs. GKAT — Risk / Return Rank
TOAK
GKAT
TOAK vs. GKAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF (TOAK) and Scharf Global Opportunity ETF (GKAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TOAK | GKAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.27 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.89 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.77 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.11 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TOAK | GKAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.82 | 1.92 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
TOAK vs. GKAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOAK drawdown since its inception was -1.81%, smaller than the maximum GKAT drawdown of -10.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOAK and GKAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOAK | GKAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.81% | -10.41% | +8.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.72% | -0.28% | -1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.10% | -2.08% | +1.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.46% | — | — |
Volatility
TOAK vs. GKAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOAK | GKAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.72% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.89% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92% | 11.97% | -9.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.22% | 11.97% | -9.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.22% | 11.97% | -9.75% |
TOAK vs. GKAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOAK has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GKAT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOAK vs. GKAT - Dividend Comparison
TOAK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GKAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GKAT Scharf Global Opportunity ETF | 0.44% | 0.24% |
TOAK Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOAK and GKAT have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TOAK is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TOAK is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GKAT.
GKAT has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.00% for TOAK.
TOAK is categorized as Multistrategy, while GKAT is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Twin Oak and Scharf Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TOAK and 0.59% for GKAT.
Find the right allocation for TOAK and GKAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer