PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TNXT vs. TGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TNXT vs. TGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Innovation Leaders ETF (TNXT) and T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TNXT

1D
0.05%
1M
-1.91%
6M
10.67%
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

TGRW

1D
1.18%
1M
-2.97%
6M
2.03%
YTD
-0.41%
1Y
8.07%
3Y*
17.00%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$159.62K$239.67K$596.13K
$19.23K$12.64K$54.16K

TNXT vs. TGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TNXT and TGRW is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2026

0.91

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TNXT vs. TGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TNXT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


TGRW
TGRW Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
TGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TNXT vs. TGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Innovation Leaders ETF (TNXT) and T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TNXTTGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.86

TNXT vs. TGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TNXT vs. TGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNXT drawdown since its inception was -13.11%, smaller than the maximum TGRW drawdown of -43.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNXT and TGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TNXTTGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.11%

-43.33%

+30.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.31%

-7.58%

+4.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.24%

-12.29%

+9.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.43%

Volatility

TNXT vs. TGRW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TNXTTGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.96%

18.24%

+2.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.96%

23.49%

-2.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.96%

22.99%

-2.03%

TNXT vs. TGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TNXT has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than TGRW's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

TNXT vs. TGRW - Dividend Comparison

Neither TNXT nor TGRW has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
TGRW
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.00%0.40%0.21%
TNXT
T. Rowe Price Innovation Leaders ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, TNXT and TGRW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, TNXT is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TNXT is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for TGRW.

TNXT and TGRW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Their fees differ too: 0.49% for TNXT and 0.52% for TGRW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TNXT and TGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer