PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TNMIX vs. QRPNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TNMIX vs. QRPNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund (TNMIX) and AQR Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class N (QRPNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNMIX achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly lower than QRPNX's 18.26% return.


TNMIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
9.29%
6M
8.36%
1Y
18.35%
3Y*
12.06%
5Y*
4.30%
10Y*
4.15%

QRPNX

1D
1.07%
1M
1.57%
YTD
18.26%
6M
18.34%
1Y
33.31%
3Y*
21.21%
5Y*
19.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TNMIX vs. QRPNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TNMIX
1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund
9.29%13.48%9.21%5.46%-11.18%3.24%4.52%8.62%-4.09%
QRPNX
AQR Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class N
18.26%23.09%18.64%6.94%24.83%14.04%-21.20%-3.25%-4.58%

Correlation

The correlation between TNMIX and QRPNX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2018

-0.01

The correlation between TNMIX and QRPNX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (5 years) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TNMIX vs. QRPNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TNMIX
TNMIX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
TNMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
TNMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

QRPNX
QRPNX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
QRPNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRPNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRPNX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
QRPNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRPNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TNMIX vs. QRPNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund (TNMIX) and AQR Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class N (QRPNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TNMIXQRPNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.62

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.10

9.40

-4.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.50

26.15

-8.65

TNMIX vs. QRPNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is lower than the QRPNX Sharpe Ratio of 3.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNMIX and QRPNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TNMIX vs. QRPNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNMIX drawdown since its inception was -17.21%, smaller than the maximum QRPNX drawdown of -28.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNMIX and QRPNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TNMIXQRPNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.21%

-28.78%

+11.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.63%

-3.51%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.17%

-11.22%

+4.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.00%

-11.22%

-4.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.81%

-1.16%

-0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.78%

-7.80%

+4.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

1.26%

-0.20%

Volatility

TNMIX vs. QRPNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund (TNMIX) is 2.51%, while AQR Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class N (QRPNX) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that TNMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QRPNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TNMIXQRPNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.51%

3.43%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.54%

6.77%

-0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.76%

9.46%

-1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.69%

11.79%

-4.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.16%

10.32%

-3.16%

TNMIX vs. QRPNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TNMIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than QRPNX's 5.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

TNMIX vs. QRPNX - Dividend Comparison

TNMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than QRPNX's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
QRPNX
AQR Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class N
0.96%1.14%2.04%4.33%0.00%3.84%1.98%0.57%0.07%0.00%0.00%
TNMIX
1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund
1.99%2.18%1.57%3.38%2.86%10.67%0.78%3.06%1.24%0.37%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


TNMIX and QRPNX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QRPNX has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to TNMIX (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNMIX dropped -17.21% vs QRPNX's -28.78%.

QRPNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TNMIX and QRPNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer