PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TNVDX vs. AYBLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TNVDX vs. AYBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund (TNVDX) and Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNVDX achieves a 5.22% return, which is significantly lower than AYBLX's 14.22% return.


TNVDX

1D
0.37%
1M
0.70%
YTD
5.22%
6M
5.32%
1Y
13.40%
3Y*
9.73%
5Y*
5.84%
10Y*

AYBLX

1D
0.93%
1M
1.85%
YTD
14.22%
6M
14.00%
1Y
33.22%
3Y*
17.09%
5Y*
9.89%
10Y*
10.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TNVDX vs. AYBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TNVDX
1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund
5.22%10.45%8.62%9.34%-8.50%10.36%13.50%18.37%-3.93%8.11%
AYBLX
Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund
14.22%19.80%9.64%15.41%-14.39%15.48%12.92%22.22%-4.43%15.19%

Correlation

The correlation between TNVDX and AYBLX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.90

The correlation between TNVDX and AYBLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TNVDX vs. AYBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TNVDX
TNVDX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
TNVDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNVDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNVDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
TNVDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNVDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

AYBLX
AYBLX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
AYBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AYBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
AYBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AYBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
AYBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TNVDX vs. AYBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund (TNVDX) and Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TNVDXAYBLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.61

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

5.12

-2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.18

23.78

-14.60

TNVDX vs. AYBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNVDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is lower than the AYBLX Sharpe Ratio of 3.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNVDX and AYBLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TNVDX vs. AYBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNVDX drawdown since its inception was -20.14%, smaller than the maximum AYBLX drawdown of -36.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNVDX and AYBLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TNVDXAYBLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.14%

-36.28%

+16.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.48%

-6.41%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.21%

-13.39%

+7.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.69%

-20.26%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-0.32%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.63%

-3.78%

+1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

1.38%

+0.07%

Volatility

TNVDX vs. AYBLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund (TNVDX) is 2.40%, while Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that TNVDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AYBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TNVDXAYBLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.40%

3.74%

-1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.11%

7.86%

-2.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.85%

9.94%

-4.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.20%

11.13%

-3.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.71%

11.33%

-2.62%

TNVDX vs. AYBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TNVDX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than AYBLX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

TNVDX vs. AYBLX - Dividend Comparison

TNVDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.11%, more than AYBLX's 3.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AYBLX
Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund
3.24%3.58%2.59%1.76%3.23%8.61%4.12%6.03%9.97%9.42%2.63%4.14%
TNVDX
1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund
8.11%7.69%9.73%5.52%4.67%10.18%8.15%5.58%5.02%6.06%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TNVDX and AYBLX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AYBLX has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to TNVDX (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNVDX dropped -20.14% vs AYBLX's -36.28%.

AYBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TNVDX and AYBLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer