TNUK vs. INFR

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

TNUK (Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF) and INFR (ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. TNUK is actively managed, while INFR is passively managed. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TNUK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for INFR.

Performance

TNUK vs. INFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF (TNUK) and ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNUK achieves a 4.83% return, which is significantly higher than INFR's 1.41% return.

TNUK

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 1.01%
• YTD: 4.83%
• 6M: 2.14%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INFR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 1.41%
• 6M: 2.04%
• 1Y: 7.57%
• 3Y*: 5.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TNUK vs. INFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TNUK Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF	4.83%	0.34%
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF	1.41%	1.19%

Correlation

The correlation between TNUK and INFR is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025	0.02

TNUK vs. INFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TNUK	INFR
Industrials	47.8%	27.5%
Utilities	28.6%	68.5%
Energy	23.4%	-
Basic Materials	0.1%	-
Technology	0.1%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	4.1%

Return for Risk

TNUK vs. INFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF (TNUK) and ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TNUK	INFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.93	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.36	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.21	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.28	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.97	—

Drawdowns

TNUK vs. INFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNUK drawdown since its inception was -21.57%, which is greater than INFR's maximum drawdown of -19.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNUK and INFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	TNUK	INFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.57%	-19.28%	-2.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.43%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.47%	-0.70%	-11.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.44%	-4.91%	-3.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.04%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TNUK	INFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.73%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.83%	8.90%	+25.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.83%	14.24%	+20.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.83%	14.24%	+20.59%

TNUK vs. INFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TNUK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than INFR's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

TNUK vs. INFR - Dividend Comparison

Neither TNUK nor INFR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF	1.71%	2.52%	2.36%	3.06%
TNUK Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TNUK and INFR in my portfolio?

TNUK and INFR have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TNUK or INFR?

On fees, INFR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TNUK or INFR?

INFR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for TNUK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TNUK or INFR?

INFR has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 0.00% for TNUK.

What is the main difference between TNUK and INFR?

They also come from different issuers: Tortoise and ClearBridge. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for TNUK and 0.59% for INFR.