TNUK vs. IEZ
TNUK (Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF) and IEZ (iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. TNUK is actively managed, while IEZ is passively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TNUK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IEZ.
Performance
TNUK vs. IEZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TNUK achieves a 4.83% return, which is significantly lower than IEZ's 34.28% return.
TNUK
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 4.83%
- 6M
- 2.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IEZ
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -12.36%
- YTD
- 34.28%
- 6M
- 34.61%
- 1Y
- 58.91%
- 3Y*
- 15.98%
- 5Y*
- 13.33%
- 10Y*
- -1.39%
TNUK vs. IEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TNUK Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 4.83% | 0.34% |
IEZ iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF | 34.28% | 1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between TNUK and IEZ is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.27 |
TNUK vs. IEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TNUK
IEZ
Industrials
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
TNUK
IEZ
Utilities
TNUK
IEZ
Energy
TNUK
IEZ
Basic Materials
TNUK
IEZ
-
Technology
TNUK
IEZ
-
Communication Services
TNUK
-
IEZ
-
Consumer Cyclical
TNUK
-
IEZ
-
Consumer Defensive
TNUK
-
IEZ
-
Financial Services
TNUK
-
IEZ
-
Healthcare
TNUK
-
IEZ
-
Real Estate
TNUK
-
IEZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TNUK vs. IEZ — Risk / Return Rank
TNUK
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IEZ
TNUK vs. IEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF (TNUK) and iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF (IEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TNUK | IEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.95 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.17 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TNUK vs. IEZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TNUK drawdown since its inception was -21.57%, smaller than the maximum IEZ drawdown of -92.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNUK and IEZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TNUK | IEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.57% | -92.52% | +70.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -40.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -88.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.47% | -55.68% | +43.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.44% | -48.26% | +39.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.23% | — |
Volatility
TNUK vs. IEZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TNUK | IEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.88% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.83% | 29.55% | +5.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.83% | 36.32% | -1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.83% | 41.55% | -6.72% |
TNUK vs. IEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TNUK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IEZ's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
TNUK vs. IEZ - Dividend Comparison
TNUK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEZ iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF | 1.24% | 1.87% | 1.76% | 0.97% | 0.65% | 1.20% | 2.07% | 2.28% | 1.81% | 3.42% | 0.91% | 2.40% |
TNUK Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TNUK and IEZ have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IEZ is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IEZ is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for TNUK.
IEZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.00% for TNUK.
They also come from different issuers: Tortoise and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for TNUK and 0.42% for IEZ.
Find the right allocation for TNUK and IEZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer