TNUK vs. GXPE
TNUK (Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF) and GXPE (Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. TNUK is actively managed, while GXPE is passively managed. Their -0.15 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. TNUK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPE.
Performance
TNUK vs. GXPE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TNUK achieves a -6.93% return, which is significantly lower than GXPE's 34.48% return.
TNUK
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -5.30%
- 6M
- -17.52%
- YTD
- -6.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
GXPE
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 12.27%
- 6M
- 17.67%
- YTD
- 34.48%
- 1Y
- 42.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 39.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $27.82K | $19.84K | $23.45K | |
| $15.71K | $18.50K | $30.73K |
TNUK vs. GXPE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TNUK Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF | -6.93% | 0.34% |
GXPE Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF | 34.48% | 1.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between TNUK and GXPE is -0.15, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TNUK vs. GXPE — Risk / Return Rank
TNUK
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GXPE
TNUK vs. GXPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF (TNUK) and Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TNUK | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.54 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.75 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TNUK vs. GXPE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TNUK drawdown since its inception was -25.30%, which is greater than GXPE's maximum drawdown of -15.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNUK and GXPE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TNUK | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.30% | -15.73% | -9.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.29% | -4.53% | -17.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.43% | -4.28% | -6.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.93% | — |
Volatility
TNUK vs. GXPE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TNUK | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.06% | 20.77% | +13.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.06% | 20.64% | +13.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.06% | 20.64% | +13.42% |
TNUK vs. GXPE - Expense Ratio Comparison
TNUK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
TNUK vs. GXPE - Dividend Comparison
TNUK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GXPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GXPE Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF | 2.07% | 1.20% |
TNUK Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TNUK and GXPE have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for TNUK.
GXPE has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 0.00% for TNUK.
They also come from different issuers: Tortoise and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for TNUK and 0.15% for GXPE.
Find the right allocation for TNUK and GXPE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer