TNUK vs. ILIT
TNUK (Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF) and ILIT (Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TNUK is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Tortoise, while ILIT is a Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the STOXX Global Lithium Miners and Producers Index - USD - Benchmark TR Net. TNUK is actively managed, while ILIT is passively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TNUK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for ILIT.
Performance
TNUK vs. ILIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TNUK achieves a -2.15% return, which is significantly lower than ILIT's -1.74% return.
TNUK
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- 6M
- -11.64%
- YTD
- -2.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ILIT
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -22.21%
- 6M
- -11.92%
- YTD
- -1.74%
- 1Y
- 82.19%
- 3Y*
- -13.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TNUK vs. ILIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TNUK Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF | -2.15% | 0.34% |
ILIT Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF | -1.74% | 5.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between TNUK and ILIT is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.57 |
TNUK vs. ILIT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TNUK
ILIT
Industrials
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Technology
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
TNUK
ILIT
Utilities
TNUK
ILIT
-
Energy
TNUK
ILIT
-
Basic Materials
TNUK
ILIT
Technology
TNUK
ILIT
Communication Services
TNUK
-
ILIT
-
Consumer Cyclical
TNUK
-
ILIT
Consumer Defensive
TNUK
-
ILIT
-
Financial Services
TNUK
-
ILIT
-
Healthcare
TNUK
-
ILIT
-
Real Estate
TNUK
-
ILIT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TNUK vs. ILIT — Risk / Return Rank
TNUK
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ILIT
TNUK vs. ILIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF (TNUK) and Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF (ILIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TNUK | ILIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.28 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.01 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TNUK vs. ILIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TNUK drawdown since its inception was -21.57%, smaller than the maximum ILIT drawdown of -73.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNUK and ILIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TNUK | ILIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.57% | -73.69% | +52.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -35.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -73.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.30% | -35.72% | +17.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.25% | -45.14% | +35.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.50% | — |
Volatility
TNUK vs. ILIT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TNUK | ILIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.45% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 35.01% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.96% | 50.86% | -16.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.96% | 42.02% | -8.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.96% | 42.02% | -8.06% |
TNUK vs. ILIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TNUK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ILIT's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
TNUK vs. ILIT - Dividend Comparison
TNUK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ILIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ILIT Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF | 2.10% | 2.27% | 6.48% | 0.69% |
TNUK Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TNUK and ILIT have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ILIT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ILIT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for TNUK.
ILIT has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.00% for TNUK.
TNUK is categorized as Energy Equities, while ILIT is Lithium & Battery Metals. They also come from different issuers: Tortoise and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for TNUK and 0.47% for ILIT.
Find the right allocation for TNUK and ILIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer