ILIT vs. ALB

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

ILIT (Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF) is Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the STOXX Global Lithium Miners and Producers Index - USD - Benchmark TR Net, while ALB (Albemarle Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, ILIT returned -14.39%/yr vs -17.58%/yr for ALB. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

ILIT vs. ALB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF (ILIT) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILIT achieves a -5.59% return, which is significantly higher than ALB's -10.62% return.

ILIT

• 1D: -3.92%
• 1M: -25.26%
• 6M: -19.17%
• YTD: -5.59%
• 1Y: 75.05%
• 3Y*: -14.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ALB

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: -26.19%
• 6M: -25.34%
• YTD: -10.62%
• 1Y: 79.62%
• 3Y*: -17.58%
• 5Y*: -6.06%
• 10Y*: 5.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILIT vs. ALB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ILIT Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF	-5.59%	81.51%	-45.14%	-28.86%
ALB Albemarle Corporation	-10.62%	67.72%	-39.50%	-35.75%

Correlation

The correlation between ILIT and ALB is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2023	0.73

The correlation between ILIT and ALB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ILIT vs. ALB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILIT

ILIT Risk / Return Rank: 51
ILIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
ILIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
ILIT Omega Ratio Rank: 49
ILIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
ILIT Martin Ratio Rank: 48

ALB

ALB Risk / Return Rank: 79
ALB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
ALB Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
ALB Omega Ratio Rank: 76
ALB Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
ALB Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILIT vs. ALB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF (ILIT) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ILIT	ALB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	1.30	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	1.90	+0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.23	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.99	1.93	+0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.41	5.67	+0.74

ILIT vs. ALB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILIT Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the ALB Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILIT and ALB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ILIT vs. ALB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILIT drawdown since its inception was -73.69%, smaller than the maximum ALB drawdown of -83.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILIT and ALB.

Drawdown Indicators

	ILIT	ALB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.69%	-83.90%	+10.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.91%	-41.51%	+3.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-73.27%	-78.08%	+4.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-83.90%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-83.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.24%	-59.31%	+21.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.14%	-20.76%	-24.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.74%	14.09%	-2.35%

Volatility

ILIT vs. ALB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF (ILIT) is 14.66%, while Albemarle Corporation (ALB) has a volatility of 15.88%. This indicates that ILIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ILIT	ALB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.66%	15.88%	-1.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.14%	42.68%	-7.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.96%	61.84%	-10.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.05%	54.75%	-12.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.05%	48.40%	-6.35%

Dividends

ILIT vs. ALB - Dividend Comparison

ILIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, more than ALB's 1.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ALB Albemarle Corporation	1.29%	1.15%	1.87%	1.11%	0.73%	0.67%	1.04%	2.01%	1.74%	1.00%	1.42%	2.07%
ILIT Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF	2.18%	2.27%	6.48%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ILIT and ALB in my portfolio?

ILIT and ALB have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ILIT or ALB?

ALB has higher volatility (15.88%) compared to ILIT (14.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILIT dropped -73.69% vs ALB's -83.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ILIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.