PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TNUIX vs. AMFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TNUIX vs. AMFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 1290 Diversified Bond Fund (TNUIX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNUIX achieves a 1.71% return, which is significantly higher than AMFIX's 0.26% return.


TNUIX

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.87%
YTD
1.71%
6M
1.32%
1Y
5.62%
3Y*
3.50%
5Y*
-1.35%
10Y*
2.80%

AMFIX

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
0.26%
6M
0.48%
1Y
2.40%
3Y*
3.29%
5Y*
0.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TNUIX vs. AMFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TNUIX
1290 Diversified Bond Fund
1.71%10.61%-3.72%3.21%-12.54%-2.46%17.14%10.28%2.30%0.68%
AMFIX
AAMA Income Fund
0.26%3.74%3.48%3.84%-6.26%-1.37%2.24%2.47%0.89%-0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between TNUIX and AMFIX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2017

0.55

The correlation between TNUIX and AMFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.68 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TNUIX vs. AMFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TNUIX
TNUIX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
TNUIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNUIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNUIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
TNUIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNUIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

AMFIX
AMFIX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
AMFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
AMFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TNUIX vs. AMFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1290 Diversified Bond Fund (TNUIX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TNUIXAMFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.50

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

3.38

-0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.23

11.26

-5.03

TNUIX vs. AMFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNUIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the AMFIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNUIX and AMFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TNUIXAMFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

2.39

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

0.34

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.56

-0.24

Drawdowns

TNUIX vs. AMFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNUIX drawdown since its inception was -26.30%, which is greater than AMFIX's maximum drawdown of -9.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNUIX and AMFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TNUIXAMFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.30%

-9.35%

-16.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.71%

-0.74%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.40%

-0.88%

-13.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.30%

-8.91%

-17.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.97%

-0.44%

-6.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.29%

-2.02%

-4.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

0.22%

+0.83%

Volatility

TNUIX vs. AMFIX - Volatility Comparison

1290 Diversified Bond Fund (TNUIX) has a higher volatility of 2.13% compared to AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX) at 0.40%. This indicates that TNUIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TNUIXAMFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.13%

0.40%

+1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.04%

0.83%

+3.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.92%

1.04%

+4.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.49%

2.17%

+7.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.73%

1.74%

+5.99%

TNUIX vs. AMFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TNUIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than AMFIX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

TNUIX vs. AMFIX - Dividend Comparison

TNUIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, more than AMFIX's 2.21% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AMFIX
AAMA Income Fund
2.21%2.08%2.44%1.70%0.83%0.57%0.83%1.24%1.24%0.40%0.00%
TNUIX
1290 Diversified Bond Fund
3.31%7.28%6.39%3.71%3.51%4.61%2.68%8.07%3.67%2.94%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


TNUIX and AMFIX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TNUIX has higher volatility (2.13%) compared to AMFIX (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNUIX dropped -26.30% vs AMFIX's -9.35%.

AMFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TNUIX and AMFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer