TNUIX vs. TNVDX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TNUIX (1290 Diversified Bond Fund) and TNVDX (1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund) are both mutual funds - TNUIX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by 1290 Funds, while TNVDX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by 1290 Funds. Over the past 5 years, TNUIX returned -1.11%/yr vs 5.63%/yr for TNVDX. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TNUIX charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for TNVDX.

Performance

TNUIX vs. TNVDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 1290 Diversified Bond Fund (TNUIX) and 1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund (TNVDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNUIX achieves a 2.68% return, which is significantly lower than TNVDX's 5.22% return.

TNUIX

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 1.95%
• YTD: 2.68%
• 6M: 2.80%
• 1Y: 6.50%
• 3Y*: 3.78%
• 5Y*: -1.11%
• 10Y*: 2.92%

TNVDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.70%
• YTD: 5.22%
• 6M: 5.12%
• 1Y: 13.07%
• 3Y*: 10.09%
• 5Y*: 5.63%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TNUIX vs. TNVDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TNUIX 1290 Diversified Bond Fund	2.68%	10.61%	-3.72%	3.21%	-12.54%	-2.46%	17.14%	10.28%	2.30%	3.47%
TNVDX 1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund	5.22%	10.45%	8.62%	9.34%	-8.50%	10.36%	13.50%	18.37%	-3.93%	8.11%

Correlation

The correlation between TNUIX and TNVDX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.34

The correlation between TNUIX and TNVDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.49 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TNUIX vs. TNVDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TNUIX

TNUIX Risk / Return Rank: 27
TNUIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
TNUIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
TNUIX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
TNUIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
TNUIX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

TNVDX

TNVDX Risk / Return Rank: 63
TNVDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
TNVDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
TNVDX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
TNVDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
TNVDX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TNUIX vs. TNVDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1290 Diversified Bond Fund (TNUIX) and 1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund (TNVDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TNUIX	TNVDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	2.30	-1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	3.14	-1.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.47	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.46	2.46	0.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.32	9.25	-2.94

TNUIX vs. TNVDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNUIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the TNVDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNUIX and TNVDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TNUIX vs. TNVDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNUIX drawdown since its inception was -26.30%, which is greater than TNVDX's maximum drawdown of -20.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNUIX and TNVDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TNUIX	TNVDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.30%	-20.14%	-6.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.71%	-5.48%	+2.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.40%	-6.21%	-8.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.17%	-17.69%	-8.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.09%	-0.28%	-5.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.29%	-2.63%	-3.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.05%	1.45%	-0.40%

Volatility

TNUIX vs. TNVDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 1290 Diversified Bond Fund (TNUIX) is 1.36%, while 1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund (TNVDX) has a volatility of 2.32%. This indicates that TNUIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNVDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TNUIX	TNVDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.36%	2.32%	-0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.12%	5.11%	-0.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.86%	5.86%	0.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.50%	7.19%	+2.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.74%	8.71%	-0.97%

TNUIX vs. TNVDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TNUIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TNVDX's 1.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

TNUIX vs. TNVDX - Dividend Comparison

TNUIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, less than TNVDX's 8.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
TNUIX 1290 Diversified Bond Fund	3.28%	7.28%	6.39%	3.71%	3.51%	4.61%	2.68%	8.07%	3.67%	2.94%	0.12%
TNVDX 1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund	8.11%	7.69%	9.73%	5.52%	4.67%	10.18%	8.15%	5.58%	5.02%	6.06%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TNUIX and TNVDX in my portfolio?

TNUIX and TNVDX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TNUIX or TNVDX?

TNVDX has higher volatility (2.32%) compared to TNUIX (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNUIX dropped -26.30% vs TNVDX's -20.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TNVDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.