TNSHX vs. TILGX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX).
TNSHX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Aug 7, 2015. TILGX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Mar 31, 2006.
Performance
TNSHX vs. TILGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TNSHX vs. TILGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNSHX TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund | -0.07% | 5.31% | 4.03% | 4.05% | -3.96% | -0.57% | 3.26% | 4.05% | 1.31% | 0.70% |
TILGX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class | -8.04% | 15.25% | 29.23% | 47.05% | -32.76% | 16.84% | 44.23% | 30.76% | -0.38% | 33.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TNSHX achieves a -0.07% return, which is significantly higher than TILGX's -8.04% return. Over the past 10 years, TNSHX has underperformed TILGX with an annualized return of 1.78%, while TILGX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.07% annualized return.
TNSHX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 3.24%
- 3Y*
- 3.85%
- 5Y*
- 1.72%
- 10Y*
- 1.78%
TILGX
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -4.53%
- YTD
- -8.04%
- 6M
- -7.03%
- 1Y
- 24.40%
- 3Y*
- 19.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.63%
- 10Y*
- 15.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TNSHX vs. TILGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TNSHX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than TILGX's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TNSHX vs. TILGX — Risk / Return Rank
TNSHX
TILGX
TNSHX vs. TILGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TNSHX | TILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.83 | 0.79 | +1.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.29 | 1.29 | +2.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.18 | +0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.14 | 1.28 | +1.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.03 | 4.26 | +6.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TNSHX | TILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 0.79 | +1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.40 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 | 0.70 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 0.53 | +0.49 |
Correlation
The correlation between TNSHX and TILGX is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
TNSHX vs. TILGX - Dividend Comparison
TNSHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than TILGX's 15.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNSHX TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund | 3.82% | 4.22% | 3.94% | 2.68% | 1.00% | 1.03% | 1.81% | 2.45% | 1.80% | 1.31% | 0.98% | 0.00% |
TILGX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class | 15.09% | 13.87% | 6.41% | 0.22% | 0.42% | 10.49% | 37.04% | 4.41% | 14.12% | 3.83% | 1.82% | 3.80% |
Drawdowns
TNSHX vs. TILGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TNSHX drawdown since its inception was -5.99%, smaller than the maximum TILGX drawdown of -52.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNSHX and TILGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TNSHX | TILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -52.16% | +46.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.13% | -15.19% | +14.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.99% | -37.86% | +31.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -5.99% | -37.86% | +31.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | -11.41% | +10.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.90% | -8.90% | +8.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.32% | 4.56% | -4.24% |
Volatility
TNSHX vs. TILGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX) is 0.52%, while TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that TNSHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TILGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TNSHX | TILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.52% | 6.43% | -5.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.18% | 12.68% | -11.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96% | 22.33% | -20.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.22% | 21.92% | -19.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.80% | 21.58% | -19.78% |