TNMIX vs. TNVDX
Compare and contrast key facts about 1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund (TNMIX) and 1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund (TNVDX).
TNMIX is managed by 1290 Funds. It was launched on Jul 5, 2015. TNVDX is managed by 1290 Funds. It was launched on Mar 6, 2016.
Performance
TNMIX vs. TNVDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TNMIX vs. TNVDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNMIX 1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund | 5.36% | 13.48% | 9.21% | 5.46% | -11.18% | 3.24% | 4.52% | 8.62% | -3.99% | 3.91% |
TNVDX 1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund | -0.48% | 10.45% | 8.62% | 9.34% | -8.50% | 10.36% | 13.50% | 18.37% | -3.93% | 8.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TNMIX achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly higher than TNVDX's -0.48% return.
TNMIX
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 17.32%
- 3Y*
- 10.87%
- 5Y*
- 4.18%
- 10Y*
- 3.99%
TNVDX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -4.67%
- YTD
- -0.48%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- 8.98%
- 3Y*
- 8.35%
- 5Y*
- 5.16%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TNMIX vs. TNVDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TNMIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than TNVDX's 1.27% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TNMIX vs. TNVDX — Risk / Return Rank
TNMIX
TNVDX
TNMIX vs. TNVDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund (TNMIX) and 1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund (TNVDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TNMIX | TNVDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.02 | 1.46 | +0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.76 | 1.91 | +0.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.30 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 1.70 | +1.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.55 | 6.60 | +8.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TNMIX | TNVDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 1.46 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.72 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.78 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between TNMIX and TNVDX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TNMIX vs. TNVDX - Dividend Comparison
TNMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than TNVDX's 7.72% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNMIX 1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund | 2.06% | 2.18% | 1.57% | 3.38% | 2.86% | 10.67% | 0.78% | 3.06% | 1.24% | 0.37% | 0.62% |
TNVDX 1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund | 7.72% | 7.69% | 9.73% | 5.52% | 4.67% | 10.18% | 8.15% | 5.58% | 5.02% | 6.06% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TNMIX vs. TNVDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TNMIX drawdown since its inception was -17.21%, smaller than the maximum TNVDX drawdown of -20.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNMIX and TNVDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TNMIX | TNVDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.21% | -20.14% | +2.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.63% | -5.48% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.15% | -17.69% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.48% | -5.02% | +2.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.84% | -2.66% | -1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.15% | 1.41% | -0.26% |
Volatility
TNMIX vs. TNVDX - Volatility Comparison
1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund (TNMIX) has a higher volatility of 3.15% compared to 1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund (TNVDX) at 2.54%. This indicates that TNMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TNVDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TNMIX | TNVDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.15% | 2.54% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.72% | 4.42% | +2.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.78% | 6.31% | +2.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.66% | 7.17% | +0.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.12% | 8.74% | -1.62% |