TNBMX vs. PRSNX
TNBMX (T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged)) and PRSNX (T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund) are both Global Bonds funds from T. Rowe Price. Over the past 5 years, TNBMX returned 1.66%/yr vs 2.35%/yr for PRSNX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TNBMX charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PRSNX.
Performance
TNBMX vs. PRSNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TNBMX achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than PRSNX's 2.79% return.
TNBMX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 2.17%
- 1Y
- 4.81%
- 3Y*
- 5.89%
- 5Y*
- 1.66%
- 10Y*
- —
PRSNX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 2.79%
- 6M
- 4.12%
- 1Y
- 8.65%
- 3Y*
- 8.41%
- 5Y*
- 2.35%
- 10Y*
- 3.98%
TNBMX vs. PRSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNBMX T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) | 1.50% | 5.25% | 5.00% | 10.32% | -12.30% | -1.63% | 5.73% | 10.77% | 1.72% | 1.35% |
PRSNX T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund | 2.79% | 9.31% | 5.60% | 12.77% | -16.27% | 0.40% | 8.16% | 11.94% | 0.45% | 0.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between TNBMX and PRSNX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2017 | 0.78 |
The correlation between TNBMX and PRSNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TNBMX vs. PRSNX — Risk / Return Rank
TNBMX
PRSNX
TNBMX vs. PRSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) (TNBMX) and T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TNBMX | PRSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.76 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 4.09 | -2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.41 | 18.30 | -10.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TNBMX vs. PRSNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TNBMX drawdown since its inception was -15.78%, smaller than the maximum PRSNX drawdown of -19.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNBMX and PRSNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TNBMX | PRSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.78% | -19.70% | +3.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.32% | -2.18% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.32% | -2.87% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.48% | -19.70% | +4.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.04% | -2.35% | -0.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.65% | 0.48% | +0.17% |
Volatility
TNBMX vs. PRSNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) (TNBMX) is 0.75%, while T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX) has a volatility of 0.86%. This indicates that TNBMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TNBMX | PRSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.75% | 0.86% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.22% | 2.39% | -0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61% | 2.93% | -0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.64% | 4.31% | -0.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.32% | 4.13% | -0.81% |
TNBMX vs. PRSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TNBMX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than PRSNX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
TNBMX vs. PRSNX - Dividend Comparison
TNBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, less than PRSNX's 7.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRSNX T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund | 7.36% | 7.87% | 6.36% | 5.08% | 3.30% | 3.95% | 3.68% | 6.33% | 4.89% | 3.59% | 3.44% | 3.60% |
TNBMX T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) | 5.05% | 4.76% | 4.24% | 2.85% | 10.20% | 2.84% | 1.90% | 4.65% | 8.20% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TNBMX and PRSNX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRSNX has higher volatility (0.86%) compared to TNBMX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNBMX dropped -15.78% vs PRSNX's -19.70%.
PRSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TNBMX and PRSNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer