TNBMX vs. PFORX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) (TNBMX) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX).
TNBMX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Sep 11, 2017. PFORX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 1, 1992.
Performance
TNBMX vs. PFORX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TNBMX vs. PFORX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNBMX T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) | -0.20% | 6.87% | 3.84% | 10.32% | -12.30% | -1.63% | 5.73% | 10.77% | 1.72% | 1.35% |
PFORX PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) | -1.93% | 4.33% | 5.70% | 9.52% | -10.33% | -1.67% | 6.17% | 7.64% | 2.64% | 1.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TNBMX achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly higher than PFORX's -1.93% return.
TNBMX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -1.97%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 1.34%
- 1Y
- 6.09%
- 3Y*
- 5.79%
- 5Y*
- 1.41%
- 10Y*
- —
PFORX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -3.10%
- YTD
- -1.93%
- 6M
- -0.89%
- 1Y
- 1.84%
- 3Y*
- 4.82%
- 5Y*
- 1.13%
- 10Y*
- 2.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TNBMX vs. PFORX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TNBMX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than PFORX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TNBMX vs. PFORX — Risk / Return Rank
TNBMX
PFORX
TNBMX vs. PFORX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) (TNBMX) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TNBMX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.32 | 0.61 | +1.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.57 | 0.86 | +2.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.12 | +0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 0.66 | +2.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.61 | 2.97 | +9.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TNBMX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 0.61 | +1.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.33 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 1.25 | -0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between TNBMX and PFORX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TNBMX vs. PFORX - Dividend Comparison
TNBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.71%, more than PFORX's 3.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNBMX T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) | 6.71% | 6.29% | 3.15% | 2.85% | 10.20% | 2.84% | 1.90% | 4.65% | 8.20% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFORX PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) | 3.86% | 4.23% | 4.91% | 3.02% | 3.65% | 1.55% | 2.46% | 6.86% | 2.90% | 1.46% | 1.38% | 9.12% |
Drawdowns
TNBMX vs. PFORX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TNBMX drawdown since its inception was -15.78%, which is greater than PFORX's maximum drawdown of -13.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNBMX and PFORX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TNBMX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.78% | -13.87% | -1.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.32% | -3.99% | +1.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.48% | -13.71% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -13.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.09% | -3.39% | +1.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.16% | -1.95% | -1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.52% | 0.89% | -0.37% |
Volatility
TNBMX vs. PFORX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) (TNBMX) is 1.15%, while PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX) has a volatility of 1.99%. This indicates that TNBMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFORX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TNBMX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.15% | 1.99% | -0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.80% | 2.55% | -0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71% | 3.39% | -0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.60% | 3.47% | +0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.33% | 3.08% | +0.25% |