PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TNBMX vs. GOBSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TNBMX vs. GOBSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) (TNBMX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund (GOBSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNBMX achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly lower than GOBSX's 1.75% return.


TNBMX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.70%
YTD
0.97%
6M
1.40%
1Y
4.39%
3Y*
5.75%
5Y*
1.52%
10Y*

GOBSX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.79%
YTD
1.75%
6M
1.61%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
3.22%
5Y*
-2.01%
10Y*
1.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TNBMX vs. GOBSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TNBMX
T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged)
0.97%5.25%5.00%10.32%-12.30%-1.63%5.73%10.77%1.72%1.35%
GOBSX
BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund
1.75%13.59%-9.38%7.42%-15.66%-5.27%12.66%9.21%-5.59%-2.68%

Correlation

The correlation between TNBMX and GOBSX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017

0.50

The correlation between TNBMX and GOBSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TNBMX vs. GOBSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TNBMX
TNBMX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
TNBMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNBMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNBMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TNBMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNBMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

GOBSX
GOBSX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
GOBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
GOBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TNBMX vs. GOBSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) (TNBMX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund (GOBSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TNBMXGOBSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.79

0.73

+1.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.87

1.12

+1.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.13

+0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

1.00

+0.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.67

2.69

+3.98

TNBMX vs. GOBSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNBMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the GOBSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNBMX and GOBSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TNBMXGOBSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

0.73

+1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

-0.22

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.44

+0.43

Drawdowns

TNBMX vs. GOBSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNBMX drawdown since its inception was -15.78%, smaller than the maximum GOBSX drawdown of -29.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNBMX and GOBSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TNBMXGOBSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.78%

-29.04%

+13.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.32%

-5.10%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.32%

-13.81%

+11.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.48%

-29.04%

+13.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-10.47%

+10.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.07%

-6.71%

+3.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

1.90%

-1.22%

Volatility

TNBMX vs. GOBSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) (TNBMX) is 0.88%, while BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund (GOBSX) has a volatility of 2.28%. This indicates that TNBMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOBSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TNBMXGOBSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

2.28%

-1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.14%

5.50%

-3.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54%

7.00%

-4.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.63%

9.30%

-5.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.33%

8.51%

-5.18%

TNBMX vs. GOBSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TNBMX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than GOBSX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

TNBMX vs. GOBSX - Dividend Comparison

TNBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, more than GOBSX's 4.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOBSX
BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund
4.05%4.28%3.80%0.09%6.70%2.30%0.31%1.56%3.15%3.68%1.87%2.61%
TNBMX
T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged)
4.78%4.76%4.24%2.85%10.20%2.84%1.90%4.65%8.20%0.64%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TNBMX and GOBSX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOBSX has higher volatility (2.28%) compared to TNBMX (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNBMX dropped -15.78% vs GOBSX's -29.04%.

TNBMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TNBMX and GOBSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer