TNBMX vs. DFGBX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TNBMX (T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged)) and DFGBX (DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio) are both Global Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, TNBMX returned 1.47%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for DFGBX. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TNBMX charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for DFGBX.

Performance

TNBMX vs. DFGBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) (TNBMX) and DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNBMX achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly lower than DFGBX's 1.15% return.

TNBMX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.70%
• YTD: 0.86%
• 6M: 1.29%
• 1Y: 4.26%
• 3Y*: 5.71%
• 5Y*: 1.47%
• 10Y*: —

DFGBX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 1.15%
• 6M: 1.33%
• 1Y: 2.38%
• 3Y*: 4.19%
• 5Y*: 1.20%
• 10Y*: 1.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TNBMX vs. DFGBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TNBMX T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged)	0.86%	5.25%	5.00%	10.32%	-12.30%	-1.63%	5.73%	10.77%	1.72%	1.35%
DFGBX DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio	1.15%	3.13%	5.37%	5.00%	-6.63%	-1.03%	1.52%	4.04%	1.68%	-1.48%

Correlation

The correlation between TNBMX and DFGBX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017	0.43

The correlation between TNBMX and DFGBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (3 years) to 0.53 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TNBMX vs. DFGBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TNBMX

TNBMX Risk / Return Rank: 37
TNBMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
TNBMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
TNBMX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
TNBMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
TNBMX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

DFGBX

DFGBX Risk / Return Rank: 25
DFGBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
DFGBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
DFGBX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
DFGBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
DFGBX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TNBMX vs. DFGBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) (TNBMX) and DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TNBMX	DFGBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	1.28	+0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	1.61	+1.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.37	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.85	1.75	+0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.30	4.74	+1.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TNBMX vs. DFGBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNBMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the DFGBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNBMX and DFGBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TNBMX	DFGBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.69	1.28	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	0.55	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	0.74	+0.13

Drawdowns

TNBMX vs. DFGBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNBMX drawdown since its inception was -15.78%, which is greater than DFGBX's maximum drawdown of -9.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNBMX and DFGBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TNBMX	DFGBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.78%	-9.63%	-6.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.32%	-1.38%	-0.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.32%	-1.67%	-0.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.48%	-9.63%	-5.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-9.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.51%	-0.20%	-0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.07%	-0.93%	-2.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.68%	0.50%	+0.18%

Volatility

TNBMX vs. DFGBX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) (TNBMX) has a higher volatility of 0.88% compared to DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGBX) at 0.58%. This indicates that TNBMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFGBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TNBMX	DFGBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.88%	0.58%	+0.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.14%	1.31%	+0.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.54%	1.88%	+0.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.63%	2.20%	+1.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.32%	1.93%	+1.39%

TNBMX vs. DFGBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TNBMX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than DFGBX's 0.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

TNBMX vs. DFGBX - Dividend Comparison

TNBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, more than DFGBX's 3.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFGBX DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio	3.43%	2.91%	4.69%	3.61%	1.63%	0.73%	0.03%	2.30%	4.74%	0.89%	1.16%	1.72%
TNBMX T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged)	4.78%	4.76%	4.24%	2.85%	10.20%	2.84%	1.90%	4.65%	8.20%	0.64%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TNBMX and DFGBX in my portfolio?

TNBMX and DFGBX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TNBMX or DFGBX?

TNBMX has higher volatility (0.88%) compared to DFGBX (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNBMX dropped -15.78% vs DFGBX's -9.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TNBMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.