PortfoliosLab logo
DFGBX vs. DFSD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DFGBX and DFSD is -0.26. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

DFGBX vs. DFSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGBX) and Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF (DFSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

DFGBX:

0.62%

DFSD:

1.71%

Max Drawdown

DFGBX:

-9.63%

DFSD:

-0.15%

Current Drawdown

DFGBX:

0.00%

DFSD:

-0.13%

Returns By Period


DFGBX

YTD

1.60%

1M

0.39%

6M

2.30%

1Y

4.95%

5Y*

0.92%

10Y*

1.41%

DFSD

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DFGBX vs. DFSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFGBX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than DFSD's 0.16% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

DFGBX vs. DFSD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFGBX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DFGBX is 9999
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DFGBX is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DFGBX is 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DFGBX is 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DFGBX is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DFGBX is 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

DFSD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DFSD is 9797
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DFSD is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DFSD is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DFSD is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DFSD is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DFSD is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DFGBX vs. DFSD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGBX) and Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF (DFSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

DFGBX vs. DFSD - Dividend Comparison

DFGBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, while DFSD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DFGBX
DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio
4.62%4.69%3.61%1.63%0.73%0.03%2.30%4.74%1.90%1.68%1.41%2.18%
DFSD
Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

DFGBX vs. DFSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFGBX drawdown since its inception was -9.63%, which is greater than DFSD's maximum drawdown of -0.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFGBX and DFSD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

DFGBX vs. DFSD - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...