TNBIX vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about 1290 SmartBeta Equity Fund (TNBIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
TNBIX is managed by 1290 Funds. It was launched on Nov 11, 2014. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
TNBIX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TNBIX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNBIX 1290 SmartBeta Equity Fund | -2.03% | 13.93% | 16.70% | 16.79% | -14.43% | 22.84% | 11.09% | 26.66% | -5.66% | 19.93% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TNBIX achieves a -2.03% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 9.35% return. Over the past 10 years, TNBIX has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 10.18%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.58% annualized return.
TNBIX
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- -5.49%
- YTD
- -2.03%
- 6M
- -0.91%
- 1Y
- 10.43%
- 3Y*
- 13.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.69%
- 10Y*
- 10.18%
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- YTD
- 9.35%
- 6M
- 9.96%
- 1Y
- 18.42%
- 3Y*
- 11.11%
- 5Y*
- 7.91%
- 10Y*
- 7.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TNBIX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TNBIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TNBIX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
TNBIX
CSUAX
TNBIX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1290 SmartBeta Equity Fund (TNBIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TNBIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 1.68 | -0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 2.23 | -0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.33 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | 2.45 | -1.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.76 | 10.62 | -4.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TNBIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 1.68 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.62 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.51 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.55 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between TNBIX and CSUAX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TNBIX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
TNBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, less than CSUAX's 7.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNBIX 1290 SmartBeta Equity Fund | 4.89% | 4.80% | 4.47% | 1.44% | 1.08% | 7.47% | 1.31% | 2.27% | 5.45% | 1.59% | 1.32% | 0.00% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.39% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
TNBIX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TNBIX drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, smaller than the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNBIX and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TNBIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.11% | -52.20% | +22.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.50% | -7.98% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.13% | -20.45% | -2.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.11% | -35.05% | +4.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.81% | -3.50% | -2.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.01% | -8.49% | +4.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 1.84% | +0.15% |
Volatility
TNBIX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
1290 SmartBeta Equity Fund (TNBIX) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.44%. This indicates that TNBIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TNBIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 3.44% | +0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.82% | 6.89% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.88% | 11.49% | +1.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.26% | 12.89% | +0.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.79% | 14.89% | -0.10% |