PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TNBIX vs. GSLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TNBIX vs. GSLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 1290 SmartBeta Equity Fund (TNBIX) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNBIX achieves a 3.71% return, which is significantly lower than GSLC's 9.23% return. Over the past 10 years, TNBIX has underperformed GSLC with an annualized return of 10.58%, while GSLC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.72% annualized return.


TNBIX

1D
-0.43%
1M
0.48%
YTD
3.71%
6M
4.50%
1Y
11.45%
3Y*
14.70%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*
10.58%

GSLC

1D
0.14%
1M
4.85%
YTD
9.23%
6M
9.80%
1Y
24.99%
3Y*
21.12%
5Y*
13.05%
10Y*
14.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TNBIX vs. GSLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TNBIX
1290 SmartBeta Equity Fund
3.71%13.93%16.70%16.79%-14.43%22.84%11.09%26.66%-5.66%19.93%
GSLC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
9.23%16.17%24.21%25.09%-18.71%27.17%19.02%30.74%-4.07%22.49%

Correlation

The correlation between TNBIX and GSLC is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2015

0.92

The correlation between TNBIX and GSLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TNBIX vs. GSLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TNBIX
TNBIX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
TNBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
TNBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

GSLC
GSLC Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
GSLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSLC Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GSLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSLC Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TNBIX vs. GSLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1290 SmartBeta Equity Fund (TNBIX) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TNBIXGSLCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.33

2.15

-0.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.93

2.95

-1.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.39

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

2.70

-1.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.90

12.04

-5.14

TNBIX vs. GSLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNBIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the GSLC Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNBIX and GSLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TNBIXGSLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

2.15

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.79

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.84

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.82

-0.18

Drawdowns

TNBIX vs. GSLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNBIX drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, smaller than the maximum GSLC drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNBIX and GSLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TNBIXGSLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.11%

-33.69%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.76%

-9.49%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.07%

-18.66%

+6.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.13%

-24.90%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.11%

-33.69%

+3.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

0.00%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.97%

-4.39%

+0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

2.13%

-0.38%

Volatility

TNBIX vs. GSLC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 1290 SmartBeta Equity Fund (TNBIX) is 2.08%, while Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) has a volatility of 2.65%. This indicates that TNBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TNBIXGSLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.08%

2.65%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.87%

8.82%

-1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.91%

11.70%

-2.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.23%

16.62%

-3.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.79%

17.68%

-2.89%

TNBIX vs. GSLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TNBIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GSLC's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

TNBIX vs. GSLC - Dividend Comparison

TNBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than GSLC's 0.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSLC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
0.92%1.00%1.11%1.38%1.61%1.06%1.35%1.54%1.89%1.69%1.69%0.36%
TNBIX
1290 SmartBeta Equity Fund
4.62%4.80%4.47%1.44%1.08%7.47%1.31%2.27%5.45%1.59%1.32%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TNBIX and GSLC have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSLC has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to TNBIX (2.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNBIX dropped -30.11% vs GSLC's -33.69%.

GSLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TNBIX and GSLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer