TNA vs. USD
TNA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares) and USD (ProShares Ultra Semiconductors) are both Leveraged Equities funds - TNA tracks the Russell 2000 Index (300%) while USD tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TNA returned 8.78%/yr vs 60.21%/yr for USD. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TNA charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for USD.
Performance
TNA vs. USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TNA achieves a 53.14% return, which is significantly lower than USD's 86.87% return. Over the past 10 years, TNA has underperformed USD with an annualized return of 8.78%, while USD has yielded a comparatively higher 60.21% annualized return.
TNA
- 1D
- 2.53%
- 1M
- 8.84%
- YTD
- 53.14%
- 6M
- 40.13%
- 1Y
- 117.40%
- 3Y*
- 25.74%
- 5Y*
- -6.50%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
USD
- 1D
- 2.08%
- 1M
- -1.66%
- YTD
- 86.87%
- 6M
- 97.77%
- 1Y
- 207.86%
- 3Y*
- 111.11%
- 5Y*
- 65.02%
- 10Y*
- 60.21%
TNA vs. USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares | 53.14% | 9.82% | 7.21% | 26.24% | -62.48% | 27.88% | -7.82% | 71.88% | -39.89% | 39.15% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 86.87% | 62.08% | 139.64% | 228.79% | -68.57% | 104.27% | 68.16% | 110.37% | -26.88% | 81.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between TNA and USD is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2008 | 0.66 |
The correlation between TNA and USD shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (3 years) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TNA vs. USD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TNA
USD
Industrials
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
TNA
USD
-
Technology
TNA
USD
Healthcare
TNA
USD
-
Financial Services
TNA
USD
Consumer Cyclical
TNA
USD
-
Real Estate
TNA
USD
-
Energy
TNA
USD
Basic Materials
TNA
USD
-
Utilities
TNA
USD
-
Communication Services
TNA
USD
-
Consumer Defensive
TNA
USD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TNA vs. USD — Risk / Return Rank
TNA
USD
TNA vs. USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) and ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TNA | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.41 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.63 | 6.58 | -2.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.92 | 18.43 | -6.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TNA vs. USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TNA drawdown since its inception was -88.09%, roughly equal to the maximum USD drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNA and USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TNA | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.09% | -88.63% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.53% | -31.80% | -0.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.78% | -64.46% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.36% | -77.85% | -4.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.09% | -77.85% | -10.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.23% | -13.67% | -21.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.92% | -32.32% | -1.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.91% | 11.34% | -1.43% |
Volatility
TNA vs. USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) is 21.54%, while ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) has a volatility of 29.56%. This indicates that TNA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TNA | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.54% | 29.56% | -8.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.61% | 52.44% | -9.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.70% | 65.34% | -6.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.57% | 77.19% | -9.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.54% | 69.61% | -1.07% |
TNA vs. USD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TNA has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than USD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TNA vs. USD - Dividend Comparison
TNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, more than USD's 0.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares | 0.39% | 0.78% | 0.93% | 1.27% | 0.31% | 0.06% | 0.03% | 0.44% | 0.36% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 0.25% | 0.39% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.72% | 0.93% | 0.32% | 0.46% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TNA and USD have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USD has higher volatility (29.56%) compared to TNA (21.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNA dropped -88.09% vs USD's -88.63%.
On 10-year performance, USD leads with 60.21% vs 8.78% for TNA. On fees, USD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TNA has been the lower-risk option at 21.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, USD has performed better with a 60.21% return vs 8.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for TNA.
TNA has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.25% for USD.
TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300%), while USD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for TNA and 0.95% for USD.
USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TNA and USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer