TNA vs. MUU

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TNA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. TNA is passively managed, while MUU is actively managed. Over the past year, TNA returned 130.31% vs 5396.82% for MUU. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TNA charges 1.14%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for MUU.

Performance

TNA vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNA achieves a 53.14% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 798.37% return.

TNA

• 1D: 4.51%
• 1M: 8.55%
• YTD: 53.14%
• 6M: 43.09%
• 1Y: 130.31%
• 3Y*: 31.74%
• 5Y*: -5.38%
• 10Y*: 7.99%

MUU

• 1D: -15.35%
• 1M: 121.05%
• YTD: 798.37%
• 6M: 1,279.44%
• 1Y: 5,396.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TNA vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares	53.14%	9.82%	0.89%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	798.37%	599.03%	-43.09%

Correlation

The correlation between TNA and MUU is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024	0.48

The correlation between TNA and MUU shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TNA vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TNA

TNA Risk / Return Rank: 67
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 52
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 72

MUU

MUU Risk / Return Rank: 99
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TNA vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TNA	MUU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	41.32	-39.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	6.77	-4.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.86	-0.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.03	104.05	-100.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.27	352.22	-338.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TNA vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNA Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 41.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNA and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TNA	MUU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.30	41.32	-39.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.08	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	5.91	-5.67

Drawdowns

TNA vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNA drawdown since its inception was -88.09%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNA and MUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	TNA	MUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.09%	-75.07%	-13.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.53%	-52.72%	+20.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-65.78%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-82.36%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-88.09%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.23%	-15.35%	-19.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.90%	-23.42%	-10.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.86%	15.54%	-5.68%

Volatility

TNA vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) is 17.02%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 56.84%. This indicates that TNA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TNA	MUU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.02%	56.84%	-39.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.45%	106.70%	-66.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.06%	132.77%	-75.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.34%	134.14%	-66.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	68.42%	134.14%	-65.72%

TNA vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TNA has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

TNA vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

TNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than MUU's 0.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	0.54%	4.27%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares	0.39%	0.78%	0.93%	1.27%	0.31%	0.06%	0.03%	0.44%	0.36%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TNA and MUU in my portfolio?

TNA and MUU have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TNA or MUU?

MUU has higher volatility (56.84%) compared to TNA (17.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNA dropped -88.09% vs MUU's -75.07%.

Which ETF is better, TNA or MUU?

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 5396.82% vs 130.31% for TNA. On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.06% per year. On volatility, TNA has been the lower-risk option at 17.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TNA or MUU?

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 5396.82% return vs 130.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TNA or MUU?

MUU is cheaper with a 1.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for TNA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TNA or MUU?

MUU has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.39% for TNA.

What is the main difference between TNA and MUU?

Their fees differ too: 1.14% for TNA and 1.06% for MUU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (41.32 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.