TMUS vs. GIC
TMUS (T-Mobile US, Inc.) and GIC (Global Industrial Company) are both stocks. TMUS operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while GIC operates in Industrial Distribution (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, TMUS returned 16.66%/yr vs 21.48%/yr for GIC. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TMUS vs. GIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMUS achieves a -5.91% return, which is significantly lower than GIC's 11.00% return. Over the past 10 years, TMUS has underperformed GIC with an annualized return of 16.66%, while GIC has yielded a comparatively higher 21.48% annualized return.
TMUS
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- -5.91%
- 6M
- -2.11%
- 1Y
- -15.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.04%
- 5Y*
- 6.35%
- 10Y*
- 16.66%
GIC
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 10.90%
- YTD
- 11.00%
- 6M
- 8.19%
- 1Y
- 26.13%
- 3Y*
- 8.68%
- 5Y*
- 2.22%
- 10Y*
- 21.48%
TMUS vs. GIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | -5.91% | -6.58% | 39.70% | 15.02% | 20.71% | -13.99% | 71.96% | 23.28% | 0.16% | 10.43% |
GIC Global Industrial Company | 11.00% | 22.45% | -34.29% | 69.66% | -41.04% | 18.77% | 62.74% | 7.69% | -1.33% | 286.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMUS and GIC is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2007 | 0.25 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TMUS and GIC has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.25, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
TMUS:
$208.40B
GIC:
$1.22B
TMUS:
$9.41
GIC:
$1.96
TMUS:
20.09
GIC:
16.28
TMUS:
0.31
GIC:
15.54
TMUS:
2.34
GIC:
0.87
TMUS:
3.73
GIC:
2.10
TMUS:
$90.53B
GIC:
$1.41B
TMUS:
$34.92B
GIC:
$500.00M
TMUS:
$28.22B
GIC:
$106.30M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMUS vs. GIC — Risk / Return Rank
TMUS
GIC
TMUS vs. GIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) and Global Industrial Company (GIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMUS | GIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.19 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 0.76 | -1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | 1.42 | -2.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMUS vs. GIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMUS drawdown since its inception was -86.29%, smaller than the maximum GIC drawdown of -98.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMUS and GIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMUS | GIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.29% | -98.09% | +11.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.37% | -30.04% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.65% | -53.19% | +19.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.65% | -53.19% | +19.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.65% | -55.74% | +22.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.12% | -25.96% | -3.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.96% | -58.91% | +32.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.87% | 16.02% | +1.85% |
Volatility
TMUS vs. GIC - Volatility Comparison
T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) has a higher volatility of 7.72% compared to Global Industrial Company (GIC) at 4.33%. This indicates that TMUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMUS | GIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.72% | 4.33% | +3.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.08% | 20.62% | -1.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.99% | 41.31% | -16.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.90% | 39.21% | -15.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.08% | 46.36% | -20.28% |
Dividends
TMUS vs. GIC - Dividend Comparison
TMUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than GIC's 3.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIC Global Industrial Company | 3.39% | 3.56% | 4.03% | 2.06% | 3.06% | 4.01% | 9.92% | 1.91% | 39.51% | 1.05% | 1.14% |
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | 2.08% | 1.80% | 1.28% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TMUS vs. GIC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between T-Mobile US, Inc. and Global Industrial Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TMUS vs. GIC - Profitability Comparison
TMUS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T-Mobile US, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 23.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GIC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Industrial Company reported a gross profit of 121.90M and revenue of 350.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
TMUS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T-Mobile US, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.50B and revenue of 23.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.
GIC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Industrial Company reported an operating income of 20.60M and revenue of 350.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.
TMUS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T-Mobile US, Inc. reported a net income of 2.50B and revenue of 23.11B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.
GIC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Industrial Company reported a net income of 16.60M and revenue of 350.40M, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TMUS and GIC have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMUS has higher volatility (7.72%) compared to GIC (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMUS dropped -86.29% vs GIC's -98.09%.
GIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMUS and GIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer