TMUS vs. CW
TMUS (T-Mobile US, Inc.) and CW (Curtiss-Wright Corporation) are both stocks. TMUS operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while CW operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, TMUS returned 16.81%/yr vs 25.25%/yr for CW. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TMUS vs. CW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMUS achieves a -6.03% return, which is significantly lower than CW's 38.43% return. Over the past 10 years, TMUS has underperformed CW with an annualized return of 16.81%, while CW has yielded a comparatively higher 25.25% annualized return.
TMUS
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- YTD
- -6.03%
- 6M
- -2.73%
- 1Y
- -15.61%
- 3Y*
- 14.68%
- 5Y*
- 6.39%
- 10Y*
- 16.81%
CW
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 7.03%
- YTD
- 38.43%
- 6M
- 39.42%
- 1Y
- 61.45%
- 3Y*
- 63.27%
- 5Y*
- 43.89%
- 10Y*
- 25.25%
TMUS vs. CW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | -6.03% | -6.58% | 39.70% | 15.02% | 20.71% | -13.99% | 71.96% | 23.28% | 0.16% | 10.43% |
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 38.43% | 55.66% | 59.73% | 33.98% | 21.03% | 19.86% | -16.83% | 38.70% | -15.79% | 24.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMUS and CW is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2007 | 0.30 |
The correlation between TMUS and CW shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TMUS:
$208.13B
CW:
$28.26B
TMUS:
$9.41
CW:
$13.64
TMUS:
20.07
CW:
55.91
TMUS:
0.30
CW:
3.05
TMUS:
2.34
CW:
7.92
TMUS:
3.72
CW:
10.74
TMUS:
$90.53B
CW:
$3.61B
TMUS:
$34.92B
CW:
$1.34B
TMUS:
$28.22B
CW:
$745.31M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMUS vs. CW — Risk / Return Rank
TMUS
CW
TMUS vs. CW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMUS | CW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.31 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 4.76 | -5.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | 13.83 | -14.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMUS vs. CW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMUS drawdown since its inception was -86.29%, which is greater than CW's maximum drawdown of -59.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMUS and CW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMUS | CW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.29% | -59.19% | -27.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.37% | -12.97% | -17.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.65% | -27.21% | -6.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.65% | -27.21% | -6.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.65% | -48.73% | +15.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.21% | 0.00% | -29.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.96% | -13.89% | -12.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.94% | 4.46% | +13.48% |
Volatility
TMUS vs. CW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) is 7.63%, while Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) has a volatility of 10.42%. This indicates that TMUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMUS | CW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.63% | 10.42% | -2.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.08% | 25.90% | -6.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.03% | 33.02% | -7.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.91% | 27.89% | -3.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.08% | 30.32% | -4.24% |
Dividends
TMUS vs. CW - Dividend Comparison
TMUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, more than CW's 0.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 0.16% | 0.17% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.51% | 0.58% | 0.47% | 0.59% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.76% |
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | 2.09% | 1.80% | 1.28% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TMUS vs. CW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between T-Mobile US, Inc. and Curtiss-Wright Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TMUS vs. CW - Profitability Comparison
TMUS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T-Mobile US, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 23.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a gross profit of 331.48M and revenue of 913.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.3%.
TMUS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T-Mobile US, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.50B and revenue of 23.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.
CW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported an operating income of 160.42M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.
TMUS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T-Mobile US, Inc. reported a net income of 2.50B and revenue of 23.11B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.
CW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a net income of 128.19M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TMUS and CW have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CW has higher volatility (10.42%) compared to TMUS (7.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMUS dropped -86.29% vs CW's -59.19%.
CW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMUS and CW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer