TMSL vs. QIDX

Last updated Jun 21, 2026

TMSL (T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF) and QIDX (Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TMSL returned 35.14% vs 13.89% for QIDX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TMSL charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for QIDX.

Performance

TMSL vs. QIDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF (TMSL) and Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMSL achieves a 19.72% return, which is significantly higher than QIDX's 8.09% return.

TMSL

• 1D: 1.49%
• 1M: 4.60%
• YTD: 19.72%
• 6M: 18.47%
• 1Y: 35.14%
• 3Y*: 20.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QIDX

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 2.28%
• YTD: 8.09%
• 6M: 7.85%
• 1Y: 13.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMSL vs. QIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TMSL T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF	19.72%	11.95%
QIDX Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF	8.09%	6.60%

Correlation

The correlation between TMSL and QIDX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2025	0.84

The correlation between TMSL and QIDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TMSL vs. QIDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMSL

TMSL Risk / Return Rank: 64
TMSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
TMSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
TMSL Omega Ratio Rank: 59
TMSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
TMSL Martin Ratio Rank: 71

QIDX

QIDX Risk / Return Rank: 39
QIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
QIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
QIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
QIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
QIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMSL vs. QIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF (TMSL) and Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TMSL	QIDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	1.27	+0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.75	1.88	+0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.22	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	2.05	+1.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.74	6.78	+5.96

TMSL vs. QIDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMSL Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the QIDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMSL and QIDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TMSL vs. QIDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMSL drawdown since its inception was -24.39%, which is greater than QIDX's maximum drawdown of -14.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMSL and QIDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMSL	QIDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.39%	-14.99%	-9.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.19%	-6.92%	-4.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.28%	-1.06%	+0.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.90%	-2.24%	-1.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.75%	2.09%	+0.66%

Volatility

TMSL vs. QIDX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF (TMSL) has a higher volatility of 6.88% compared to Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX) at 3.06%. This indicates that TMSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TMSL	QIDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.88%	3.06%	+3.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.66%	8.56%	+6.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.10%	11.15%	+6.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.57%	14.58%	+3.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.57%	14.58%	+3.99%

TMSL vs. QIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMSL has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QIDX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMSL vs. QIDX - Dividend Comparison

TMSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than QIDX's 0.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
QIDX Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF	0.85%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%
TMSL T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF	0.47%	0.57%	0.44%	0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMSL and QIDX in my portfolio?

TMSL and QIDX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TMSL or QIDX?

TMSL has higher volatility (6.88%) compared to QIDX (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMSL dropped -24.39% vs QIDX's -14.99%.

Which ETF is better, TMSL or QIDX?

On 1-year performance, TMSL leads with 35.14% vs 13.89% for QIDX. On fees, QIDX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, QIDX has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TMSL or QIDX?

Over the 1-year period, TMSL has performed better with a 35.14% return vs 13.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TMSL or QIDX?

QIDX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TMSL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TMSL or QIDX?

QIDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.47% for TMSL.

What is the main difference between TMSL and QIDX?

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Indexperts. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TMSL and 0.50% for QIDX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TMSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.