PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMSIX vs. SWMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMSIX vs. SWMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) and Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMSIX achieves a 15.19% return, which is significantly higher than SWMCX's 12.72% return.


TMSIX

1D
0.70%
1M
4.85%
YTD
15.19%
6M
14.64%
1Y
20.73%
3Y*
14.71%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*
12.29%

SWMCX

1D
0.68%
1M
4.11%
YTD
12.72%
6M
12.56%
1Y
22.05%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
8.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMSIX vs. SWMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMSIX
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S
15.19%4.64%14.08%13.90%-17.68%28.06%21.96%24.88%-10.47%0.14%
SWMCX
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund
12.72%10.54%15.28%17.20%-17.31%22.55%17.03%30.46%-9.16%0.40%

Correlation

The correlation between TMSIX and SWMCX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2017

0.96

The correlation between TMSIX and SWMCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMSIX vs. SWMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMSIX
TMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
TMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
TMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

SWMCX
SWMCX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SWMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
SWMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMSIX vs. SWMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) and Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMSIXSWMCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.30

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

2.87

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.82

11.01

-2.19

TMSIX vs. SWMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the SWMCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMSIX and SWMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMSIXSWMCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

1.74

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.46

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.52

-0.06

Drawdowns

TMSIX vs. SWMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMSIX drawdown since its inception was -56.10%, which is greater than SWMCX's maximum drawdown of -40.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMSIX and SWMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMSIXSWMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.10%

-40.34%

-15.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.97%

-8.15%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.18%

-21.07%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.57%

-26.09%

-5.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.00%

-6.63%

-3.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

2.12%

+0.36%

Volatility

TMSIX vs. SWMCX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) has a higher volatility of 3.52% compared to Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX) at 3.27%. This indicates that TMSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMSIXSWMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

3.27%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.87%

9.96%

+0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.29%

13.42%

+0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.42%

18.25%

+2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.46%

20.64%

-0.18%

TMSIX vs. SWMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMSIX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than SWMCX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMSIX vs. SWMCX - Dividend Comparison

TMSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.76%, more than SWMCX's 1.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWMCX
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund
1.89%2.13%2.60%1.49%1.59%2.93%1.45%2.44%1.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TMSIX
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S
10.76%12.39%7.91%1.48%2.86%10.77%3.26%2.77%11.64%7.92%4.10%11.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, TMSIX and SWMCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TMSIX has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to SWMCX (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMSIX dropped -56.10% vs SWMCX's -40.34%.

SWMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMSIX and SWMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer