PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWMCX vs. SCHM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWMCX vs. SCHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWMCX achieves a 13.41% return, which is significantly lower than SCHM's 21.21% return.


SWMCX

1D
1.05%
1M
2.84%
YTD
13.41%
6M
11.55%
1Y
22.93%
3Y*
16.36%
5Y*
8.82%
10Y*

SCHM

1D
0.75%
1M
4.69%
YTD
21.21%
6M
18.53%
1Y
34.77%
3Y*
18.54%
5Y*
8.58%
10Y*
11.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWMCX vs. SCHM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWMCX
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund
13.41%10.54%15.28%17.20%-17.31%22.55%17.03%30.46%-9.16%0.40%
SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF
21.21%10.17%11.98%16.69%-17.07%19.36%15.26%27.48%-8.77%0.24%

Correlation

The correlation between SWMCX and SCHM is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2017

0.98

The correlation between SWMCX and SCHM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

SWMCX vs. SCHM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SWMCX
SCHM

Industrials

18.4%
21.7%

Technology

17.2%
22.1%

Financial Services

12.5%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
10.8%

Healthcare

8.7%
10.9%

Energy

7.2%
3.4%

Real Estate

7.0%
6.4%

Utilities

6.1%
2.9%

Basic Materials

4.3%
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
3.4%

Communication Services

3.4%
2.6%

Industrials

SWMCX
18.4%
SCHM
21.7%

Technology

SWMCX
17.2%
SCHM
22.1%

Financial Services

SWMCX
12.5%
SCHM
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SWMCX
11.2%
SCHM
10.8%

Healthcare

SWMCX
8.7%
SCHM
10.9%

Energy

SWMCX
7.2%
SCHM
3.4%

Real Estate

SWMCX
7.0%
SCHM
6.4%

Utilities

SWMCX
6.1%
SCHM
2.9%

Basic Materials

SWMCX
4.3%
SCHM
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

SWMCX
4.1%
SCHM
3.4%

Communication Services

SWMCX
3.4%
SCHM
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWMCX vs. SCHM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWMCX
SWMCX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SWMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SWMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHM
SCHM Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SCHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHM Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHM Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWMCX vs. SCHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWMCXSCHMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.37

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

3.75

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.84

14.98

-4.14

SWMCX vs. SCHM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWMCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the SCHM Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWMCX and SCHM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWMCX vs. SCHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWMCX drawdown since its inception was -40.34%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHM drawdown of -42.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWMCX and SCHM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWMCXSCHMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.34%

-42.43%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.15%

-9.32%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.07%

-23.27%

+2.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.09%

-26.46%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

0.00%

-0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.60%

-5.64%

-0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

2.33%

-0.20%

Volatility

SWMCX vs. SCHM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX) is 4.56%, while Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that SWMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWMCXSCHMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

5.46%

-0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.48%

12.47%

-1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.82%

16.23%

-2.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.32%

19.65%

-1.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.62%

20.51%

+0.11%

SWMCX vs. SCHM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SWMCX and SCHM have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWMCX vs. SCHM - Dividend Comparison

SWMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than SCHM's 1.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF
1.20%1.46%1.43%1.50%1.67%1.13%1.31%1.48%1.56%1.27%1.51%1.54%
SWMCX
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund
1.87%2.13%2.60%1.49%1.59%2.93%1.45%2.44%1.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, SWMCX and SCHM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHM has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to SWMCX (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWMCX dropped -40.34% vs SCHM's -42.43%.

SCHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWMCX and SCHM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer