PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMSIX vs. GWSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMSIX vs. GWSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) and Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund (GWSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMSIX achieves a 15.19% return, which is significantly higher than GWSAX's 8.60% return. Over the past 10 years, TMSIX has outperformed GWSAX with an annualized return of 12.29%, while GWSAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.92% annualized return.


TMSIX

1D
0.70%
1M
4.85%
YTD
15.19%
6M
14.64%
1Y
20.73%
3Y*
14.71%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*
12.29%

GWSAX

1D
0.55%
1M
0.72%
YTD
8.60%
6M
9.63%
1Y
16.35%
3Y*
11.18%
5Y*
5.34%
10Y*
5.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMSIX vs. GWSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMSIX
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S
15.19%4.64%14.08%13.90%-17.68%28.06%21.96%24.88%-10.47%18.90%
GWSAX
Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund
8.60%2.11%13.19%11.90%-13.71%27.12%8.69%26.78%-25.30%17.07%

Correlation

The correlation between TMSIX and GWSAX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2003

0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between TMSIX and GWSAX has dropped to 0.60 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMSIX vs. GWSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMSIX
TMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
TMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
TMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

GWSAX
GWSAX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
GWSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GWSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMSIX vs. GWSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) and Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund (GWSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMSIXGWSAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.31

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

2.65

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.82

7.00

+1.82

TMSIX vs. GWSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the GWSAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMSIX and GWSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMSIXGWSAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

1.80

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.35

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.30

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.35

+0.12

Drawdowns

TMSIX vs. GWSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMSIX drawdown since its inception was -56.10%, roughly equal to the maximum GWSAX drawdown of -55.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMSIX and GWSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMSIXGWSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.10%

-55.75%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.97%

-6.54%

-2.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.18%

-15.58%

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.57%

-18.91%

-12.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.66%

-50.67%

+10.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.42%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.00%

-9.26%

-0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

2.47%

+0.01%

Volatility

TMSIX vs. GWSAX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) has a higher volatility of 3.52% compared to Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund (GWSAX) at 2.16%. This indicates that TMSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GWSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMSIXGWSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

2.16%

+1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.87%

6.38%

+4.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.29%

9.65%

+4.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.42%

15.38%

+5.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.46%

19.96%

+0.50%

TMSIX vs. GWSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMSIX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than GWSAX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMSIX vs. GWSAX - Dividend Comparison

TMSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.76%, more than GWSAX's 4.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GWSAX
Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund
4.84%5.11%4.39%4.57%5.00%3.90%0.00%0.00%0.09%0.49%1.16%0.00%
TMSIX
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S
10.76%12.39%7.91%1.48%2.86%10.77%3.26%2.77%11.64%7.92%4.10%11.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMSIX and GWSAX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMSIX has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to GWSAX (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMSIX dropped -56.10% vs GWSAX's -55.75%.

GWSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMSIX and GWSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer