GWSAX vs. LLSCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund (GWSAX) and Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX).
GWSAX is managed by Gabelli. It was launched on Dec 31, 2002. LLSCX is managed by Longleaf Partners. It was launched on Feb 21, 1989.
Performance
GWSAX vs. LLSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GWSAX vs. LLSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GWSAX Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund | 5.16% | 2.11% | 13.19% | 11.90% | -13.71% | 27.12% | 8.69% | 26.78% | -25.30% | 17.07% |
LLSCX Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund | -3.68% | 7.56% | 9.69% | 20.17% | -19.25% | 11.18% | 4.17% | 27.74% | -6.52% | 9.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GWSAX achieves a 5.16% return, which is significantly higher than LLSCX's -3.68% return. Over the past 10 years, GWSAX has underperformed LLSCX with an annualized return of 6.00%, while LLSCX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.69% annualized return.
GWSAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -2.74%
- YTD
- 5.16%
- 6M
- 5.55%
- 1Y
- 5.47%
- 3Y*
- 10.31%
- 5Y*
- 6.27%
- 10Y*
- 6.00%
LLSCX
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- YTD
- -3.68%
- 6M
- -2.59%
- 1Y
- 2.07%
- 3Y*
- 9.42%
- 5Y*
- 1.87%
- 10Y*
- 6.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GWSAX vs. LLSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GWSAX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than LLSCX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GWSAX vs. LLSCX — Risk / Return Rank
GWSAX
LLSCX
GWSAX vs. LLSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund (GWSAX) and Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GWSAX | LLSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.34 | 0.15 | +0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.54 | 0.32 | +0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.04 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.28 | 0.10 | +0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.88 | 0.30 | +0.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GWSAX | LLSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 | 0.15 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.11 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.27 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.51 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between GWSAX and LLSCX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GWSAX vs. LLSCX - Dividend Comparison
GWSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, more than LLSCX's 1.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GWSAX Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund | 4.96% | 5.11% | 4.39% | 4.57% | 5.00% | 3.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.09% | 0.49% | 1.16% | 0.00% |
LLSCX Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund | 1.22% | 1.17% | 0.11% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 0.82% | 5.85% | 14.89% | 18.13% | 8.43% | 18.01% | 5.91% |
Drawdowns
GWSAX vs. LLSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GWSAX drawdown since its inception was -55.75%, smaller than the maximum LLSCX drawdown of -63.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWSAX and LLSCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GWSAX | LLSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.75% | -63.97% | +8.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.17% | -10.47% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.91% | -28.37% | +9.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.67% | -42.23% | -8.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.58% | -7.92% | +4.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.32% | -8.90% | -0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.42% | 3.68% | +0.74% |
Volatility
GWSAX vs. LLSCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund (GWSAX) is 3.12%, while Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX) has a volatility of 3.90%. This indicates that GWSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LLSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GWSAX | LLSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 3.90% | -0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.14% | 9.23% | -2.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.10% | 15.42% | +0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.43% | 17.00% | -1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.06% | 24.58% | -4.52% |