PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMQ vs. REMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMQ vs. REMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ) and VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMQ achieves a 3.02% return, which is significantly lower than REMX's 31.22% return. Over the past 10 years, TMQ has outperformed REMX with an annualized return of 24.63%, while REMX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.67% annualized return.


TMQ

1D
-0.22%
1M
5.21%
YTD
3.02%
6M
-5.53%
1Y
241.54%
3Y*
105.72%
5Y*
8.23%
10Y*
24.63%

REMX

1D
-1.34%
1M
-6.58%
YTD
31.22%
6M
39.17%
1Y
160.26%
3Y*
6.64%
5Y*
4.22%
10Y*
9.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMQ vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMQ
Trilogy Metals Inc.
3.02%271.55%169.77%-21.82%-66.67%-17.50%-23.08%50.29%58.72%114.95%
REMX
VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF
31.22%92.95%-35.02%-19.18%-31.13%79.81%64.82%0.74%-49.63%82.60%

Correlation

The correlation between TMQ and REMX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2012

0.25

Over the past year, TMQ and REMX have become more correlated (0.51) than their long-term average of 0.25, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMQ vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMQ
TMQ Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
TMQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
TMQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

REMX
REMX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
REMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
REMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
REMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
REMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMQ vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ) and VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMQREMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.44

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

6.91

-3.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.20

19.75

-14.54

TMQ vs. REMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the REMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMQ and REMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMQREMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

3.36

-2.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.11

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.26

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

-0.08

+0.07

Drawdowns

TMQ vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMQ drawdown since its inception was -96.55%, which is greater than REMX's maximum drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMQ and REMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMQREMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.55%

-90.20%

-6.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.62%

-23.35%

-46.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.62%

-62.11%

-7.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.53%

-73.34%

-14.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.01%

-73.34%

-14.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.11%

-55.58%

-2.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.96%

-66.86%

-5.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

46.64%

8.15%

+38.49%

Volatility

TMQ vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison

Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ) has a higher volatility of 20.58% compared to VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) at 12.92%. This indicates that TMQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMQREMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.58%

12.92%

+7.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.56%

34.80%

+22.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

234.93%

48.11%

+186.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

128.30%

40.23%

+88.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

101.04%

36.93%

+64.11%

Dividends

TMQ vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison

TMQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REMX
VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF
1.34%1.76%2.56%0.00%1.56%5.25%0.81%1.64%12.43%2.89%2.23%4.77%
TMQ
Trilogy Metals Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMQ and REMX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMQ has higher volatility (20.58%) compared to REMX (12.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMQ dropped -96.55% vs REMX's -90.20%.

REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMQ and REMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer