TMLPX vs. FLIAX
TMLPX (Transamerica Energy Infrastructure) and FLIAX (First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund) are both Infrastructure Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, TMLPX returned 16.60%/yr vs 6.55%/yr for FLIAX. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TMLPX charges 1.26%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FLIAX.
Performance
TMLPX vs. FLIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMLPX achieves a 25.97% return, which is significantly higher than FLIAX's 17.06% return.
TMLPX
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- 6M
- 18.64%
- YTD
- 25.97%
- 1Y
- 27.38%
- 3Y*
- 23.04%
- 5Y*
- 16.60%
- 10Y*
- 9.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.30%
FLIAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- 6M
- 14.38%
- YTD
- 17.06%
- 1Y
- 8.36%
- 3Y*
- 10.59%
- 5Y*
- 6.55%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
TMLPX vs. FLIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMLPX Transamerica Energy Infrastructure | 25.97% | 3.87% | 38.51% | 5.07% | 9.12% | 11.96% |
FLIAX First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund | 17.06% | -0.20% | 12.21% | 0.59% | -5.85% | 24.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMLPX and FLIAX is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2021 | 0.62 |
The correlation between TMLPX and FLIAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMLPX vs. FLIAX — Risk / Return Rank
TMLPX
FLIAX
TMLPX vs. FLIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Energy Infrastructure (TMLPX) and First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMLPX | FLIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.13 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.80 | 0.76 | +3.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.61 | 2.49 | +7.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMLPX vs. FLIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMLPX drawdown since its inception was -67.18%, which is greater than FLIAX's maximum drawdown of -23.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMLPX and FLIAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMLPX | FLIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.18% | -23.23% | -43.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.12% | -12.50% | +5.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.60% | -12.50% | -4.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.60% | -23.23% | +6.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.71% | -3.19% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.33% | -6.31% | -16.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 3.60% | -0.79% |
Volatility
TMLPX vs. FLIAX - Volatility Comparison
Transamerica Energy Infrastructure (TMLPX) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIAX) at 4.19%. This indicates that TMLPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMLPX | FLIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | 4.19% | +1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.65% | 10.32% | +1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.35% | 15.99% | -1.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 16.13% | +1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.79% | 15.77% | +6.02% |
TMLPX vs. FLIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMLPX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than FLIAX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMLPX vs. FLIAX - Dividend Comparison
TMLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, while FLIAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLIAX First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.21% | 2.90% | 19.90% | 5.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMLPX Transamerica Energy Infrastructure | 3.78% | 4.33% | 3.71% | 7.34% | 4.83% | 4.33% | 6.09% | 5.65% | 6.10% | 5.51% | 3.95% | 5.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMLPX and FLIAX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMLPX has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to FLIAX (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMLPX dropped -67.18% vs FLIAX's -23.23%.
TMLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMLPX and FLIAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer