TMLPX vs. ENFR
Compare and contrast key facts about Transamerica Energy Infrastructure (TMLPX) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR).
TMLPX is managed by Transamerica. It was launched on Apr 29, 2013. ENFR is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2013.
Performance
TMLPX vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TMLPX vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMLPX Transamerica Energy Infrastructure | 22.91% | 3.87% | 38.51% | 5.07% | 9.12% | 23.54% | -11.25% | 15.66% | -15.29% | -0.19% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 22.85% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 15.63% | 17.48% | 39.97% | -24.14% | 21.60% | -18.67% | -0.19% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TMLPX having a 22.91% return and ENFR slightly lower at 22.85%. Over the past 10 years, TMLPX has underperformed ENFR with an annualized return of 11.05%, while ENFR has yielded a comparatively higher 13.64% annualized return.
TMLPX
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- YTD
- 22.91%
- 6M
- 21.45%
- 1Y
- 20.55%
- 3Y*
- 22.91%
- 5Y*
- 17.80%
- 10Y*
- 11.05%
ENFR
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 4.03%
- YTD
- 22.85%
- 6M
- 20.70%
- 1Y
- 22.29%
- 3Y*
- 28.68%
- 5Y*
- 23.59%
- 10Y*
- 13.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TMLPX vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMLPX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TMLPX vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank
TMLPX
ENFR
TMLPX vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Energy Infrastructure (TMLPX) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMLPX | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 1.25 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 1.63 | -0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.25 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 1.49 | -0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.02 | 4.94 | -0.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMLPX | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 1.25 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | 1.24 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.55 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.34 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between TMLPX and ENFR is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TMLPX vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
TMLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, less than ENFR's 4.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMLPX Transamerica Energy Infrastructure | 3.68% | 4.33% | 3.71% | 7.34% | 4.83% | 4.33% | 6.09% | 5.65% | 6.10% | 5.51% | 3.95% | 5.58% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.02% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
Drawdowns
TMLPX vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMLPX drawdown since its inception was -67.18%, roughly equal to the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMLPX and ENFR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMLPX | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.18% | -68.28% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.74% | -14.80% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.60% | -20.29% | +3.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.61% | -62.64% | +7.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -2.18% | +1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.87% | -16.16% | -6.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.17% | 4.47% | +0.70% |
Volatility
TMLPX vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
Transamerica Energy Infrastructure (TMLPX) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) at 3.72%. This indicates that TMLPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TMLPX | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | 3.72% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.35% | 10.21% | -0.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.80% | 17.91% | -0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 19.18% | -2.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.79% | 24.74% | -2.95% |