PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMHC vs. PANW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TMHC vs. PANW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMHC achieves a 22.13% return, which is significantly lower than PANW's 51.80% return. Over the past 10 years, TMHC has underperformed PANW with an annualized return of 17.21%, while PANW has yielded a comparatively higher 29.12% annualized return.


TMHC

1D
-0.01%
1M
26.25%
YTD
22.13%
6M
14.86%
1Y
23.90%
3Y*
15.27%
5Y*
20.87%
10Y*
17.21%

PANW

1D
0.03%
1M
17.38%
YTD
51.80%
6M
45.87%
1Y
42.47%
3Y*
33.77%
5Y*
35.61%
10Y*
29.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMHC vs. PANW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMHC
Taylor Morrison Home Corporation
22.13%-3.82%14.73%75.78%-13.19%36.30%17.34%37.48%-35.02%27.05%
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
51.80%1.23%23.41%111.32%-24.81%56.66%53.68%22.78%29.95%15.91%

Correlation

The correlation between TMHC and PANW is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2013

0.24

The correlation between TMHC and PANW shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.24 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TMHC:

$7.01B

PANW:

$208.04B

EPS

TMHC:

$6.75

PANW:

$1.17

PE Ratio

TMHC:

10.65

PANW:

238.46

PEG Ratio

TMHC:

0.66

PANW:

0.02

PS Ratio

TMHC:

0.94

PANW:

18.95

PB Ratio

TMHC:

1.12

PANW:

7.52

Total Revenue (TTM)

TMHC:

$7.61B

PANW:

$10.61B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TMHC:

$1.71B

PANW:

$7.63B

EBITDA (TTM)

TMHC:

$1.00B

PANW:

$1.33B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMHC vs. PANW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMHC
TMHC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
TMHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMHC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
TMHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMHC Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

PANW
PANW Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PANW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PANW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
PANW Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PANW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PANW Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMHC vs. PANW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMHCPANWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.21

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

1.16

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.66

2.62

-0.96

TMHC vs. PANW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMHC Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the PANW Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMHC and PANW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMHC vs. PANW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMHC drawdown since its inception was -75.18%, which is greater than PANW's maximum drawdown of -47.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMHC and PANW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMHCPANWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.18%

-47.98%

-27.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.80%

-36.01%

+12.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.90%

-36.01%

+8.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.84%

-36.01%

-4.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.18%

-47.98%

-27.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.88%

-6.94%

+3.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.26%

-14.68%

-5.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.79%

15.87%

-3.08%

Volatility

TMHC vs. PANW - Volatility Comparison

Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) has a higher volatility of 21.03% compared to Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) at 16.97%. This indicates that TMHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PANW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMHCPANWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.03%

16.97%

+4.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.55%

32.33%

-2.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.09%

38.96%

+0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.83%

41.72%

-3.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.77%

38.62%

+6.15%

Dividends

TMHC vs. PANW - Dividend Comparison

Neither TMHC nor PANW has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

TMHC vs. PANW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Taylor Morrison Home Corporation and Palo Alto Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
1.39B
3.00B
(TMHC) Total Revenue
(PANW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TMHC vs. PANW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Taylor Morrison Home Corporation and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
21.0%
67.6%
Portfolio components
TMHC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Taylor Morrison Home Corporation reported a gross profit of 290.64M and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.0%.

PANW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.03B and revenue of 3.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

TMHC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Taylor Morrison Home Corporation reported an operating income of 141.79M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.2%.

PANW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of -186.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.2%.

TMHC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Taylor Morrison Home Corporation reported a net income of 100.43M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.

PANW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a net income of -177.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in a net margin of -5.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TMHC and PANW have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMHC has higher volatility (21.03%) compared to PANW (16.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMHC dropped -75.18% vs PANW's -47.98%.

PANW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMHC and PANW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer