TMFX vs. IMCG
TMFX (Motley Fool Next Index ETF) and IMCG (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - TMFX tracks the Motley Fool Next Index while IMCG tracks the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TMFX returned 13.61%/yr vs 18.91%/yr for IMCG. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TMFX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IMCG.
Performance
TMFX vs. IMCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFX achieves a 4.09% return, which is significantly lower than IMCG's 20.05% return.
TMFX
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 5.95%
- YTD
- 4.09%
- 6M
- 4.52%
- 1Y
- 12.73%
- 3Y*
- 13.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IMCG
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 8.33%
- YTD
- 20.05%
- 6M
- 18.28%
- 1Y
- 23.35%
- 3Y*
- 18.91%
- 5Y*
- 8.62%
- 10Y*
- 14.46%
TMFX vs. IMCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMFX Motley Fool Next Index ETF | 4.09% | 10.41% | 16.04% | 17.95% | -28.16% |
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 20.05% | 6.55% | 18.14% | 20.73% | -25.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFX and IMCG is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2022 | 0.94 |
The correlation between TMFX and IMCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
TMFX vs. IMCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TMFX
IMCG
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
-
Technology
TMFX
IMCG
Healthcare
TMFX
IMCG
Consumer Cyclical
TMFX
IMCG
Industrials
TMFX
IMCG
Financial Services
TMFX
IMCG
Communication Services
TMFX
IMCG
Consumer Defensive
TMFX
IMCG
Real Estate
TMFX
IMCG
Basic Materials
TMFX
IMCG
Energy
TMFX
IMCG
Utilities
TMFX
-
IMCG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFX vs. IMCG — Risk / Return Rank
TMFX
IMCG
TMFX vs. IMCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Next Index ETF (TMFX) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMFX | IMCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.26 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 2.31 | -1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.93 | 8.97 | -6.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMFX | IMCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | 1.51 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.54 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
TMFX vs. IMCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFX drawdown since its inception was -34.30%, smaller than the maximum IMCG drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFX and IMCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFX | IMCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.30% | -58.96% | +24.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.95% | -10.17% | -3.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.05% | -21.92% | -2.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.78% | -0.26% | -1.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.38% | -9.22% | -5.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.35% | 2.61% | +1.74% |
Volatility
TMFX vs. IMCG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Motley Fool Next Index ETF (TMFX) is 4.11%, while iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) has a volatility of 4.65%. This indicates that TMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFX | IMCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | 4.65% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.33% | 12.53% | -0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.86% | 15.53% | +1.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.39% | 20.17% | +3.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.39% | 20.51% | +2.88% |
TMFX vs. IMCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCG's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMFX vs. IMCG - Dividend Comparison
TMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than IMCG's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.65% | 0.78% | 0.78% | 0.85% | 0.91% | 0.41% | 0.09% | 0.30% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.38% |
TMFX Motley Fool Next Index ETF | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.06% | 0.16% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFX and IMCG have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMCG has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to TMFX (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFX dropped -34.30% vs IMCG's -58.96%.
On 3-year performance, IMCG leads with 18.91% vs 13.61% for TMFX. On fees, IMCG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, TMFX has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IMCG has performed better with a 18.91% return vs 13.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IMCG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TMFX.
IMCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.05% for TMFX.
TMFX tracks Motley Fool Next Index, while IMCG tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TMFX and 0.06% for IMCG.
IMCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMFX and IMCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer