TMFX vs. BBHM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TMFX (Motley Fool Next Index ETF) and BBHM (BBH Select Mid Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - TMFX tracks the Motley Fool Next Index while BBHM tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMFX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for BBHM.

Performance

TMFX vs. BBHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Next Index ETF (TMFX) and BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFX achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly lower than BBHM's 3.11% return.

TMFX

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 1.68%
• 6M: -0.26%
• 1Y: 10.28%
• 3Y*: 12.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BBHM

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 2.63%
• YTD: 3.11%
• 6M: 1.63%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMFX vs. BBHM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TMFX Motley Fool Next Index ETF	1.68%	3.45%
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF	3.11%	0.98%

Correlation

The correlation between TMFX and BBHM is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025	0.79

Return for Risk

TMFX vs. BBHM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMFX

TMFX Risk / Return Rank: 18
TMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
TMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
TMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
TMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
TMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

BBHM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMFX vs. BBHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Next Index ETF (TMFX) and BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TMFX	BBHM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.74	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.34	—	—

Drawdowns

TMFX vs. BBHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFX drawdown since its inception was -34.72%, which is greater than BBHM's maximum drawdown of -9.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFX and BBHM.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMFX	BBHM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.72%	-9.78%	-24.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.06%	-4.05%	-0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.57%	-2.97%	-11.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.40%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TMFX	BBHM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.40%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.80%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.13%	18.20%	-1.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.33%	18.20%	+5.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.33%	18.20%	+5.13%

TMFX vs. BBHM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMFX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BBHM's 0.81% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMFX vs. BBHM - Dividend Comparison

TMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, while BBHM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TMFX Motley Fool Next Index ETF	0.05%	0.05%	0.06%	0.16%	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMFX and BBHM in my portfolio?

TMFX and BBHM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TMFX or BBHM?

On fees, TMFX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TMFX or BBHM?

TMFX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for BBHM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TMFX or BBHM?

TMFX has the higher dividend yield at 0.05%, compared with 0.00% for BBHM.

What is the main difference between TMFX and BBHM?

TMFX tracks Motley Fool Next Index, while BBHM tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and BBH. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TMFX and 0.81% for BBHM.