TMFM vs. MFVL
TMFM (Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool, while MFVL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool. Both are actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMFM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MFVL.
Performance
TMFM vs. MFVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFM achieves a -9.50% return, which is significantly lower than MFVL's 0.39% return.
TMFM
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- YTD
- -9.50%
- 6M
- -11.03%
- 1Y
- -18.27%
- 3Y*
- 3.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFVL
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMFM vs. MFVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF | -9.50% | -0.40% |
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.39% | 1.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFM and MFVL is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFM vs. MFVL — Risk / Return Rank
TMFM
MFVL
TMFM vs. MFVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMFM | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMFM | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.98 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.14 | 0.31 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
TMFM vs. MFVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFM drawdown since its inception was -31.75%, which is greater than MFVL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFM and MFVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFM | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.75% | -7.03% | -24.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.35% | -3.29% | -23.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.85% | -2.42% | -13.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.65% | — | — |
Volatility
TMFM vs. MFVL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFM | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.99% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.54% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.76% | 12.15% | +6.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.63% | 12.15% | +8.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.63% | 12.15% | +8.48% |
TMFM vs. MFVL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MFVL's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMFM vs. MFVL - Dividend Comparison
TMFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, while MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.06% | 16.27% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFM and MFVL have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MFVL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFVL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFM.
TMFM has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.
TMFM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while MFVL is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFM and 0.50% for MFVL.
Find the right allocation for TMFM and MFVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer