TMFM vs. MFMO
TMFM (Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and MFMO (Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool, while MFMO is a Momentum fund actively managed by Motley Fool. Both are actively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TMFM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MFMO.
Performance
TMFM vs. MFMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFM achieves a -8.40% return, which is significantly lower than MFMO's 24.93% return.
TMFM
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- 3.69%
- YTD
- -8.40%
- 6M
- -9.85%
- 1Y
- -18.32%
- 3Y*
- 3.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFMO
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 8.66%
- YTD
- 24.93%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMFM vs. MFMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF | -8.40% | -0.40% |
MFMO Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF | 24.93% | -1.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFM and MFMO is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFM vs. MFMO — Risk / Return Rank
TMFM
MFMO
TMFM vs. MFMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) and Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF (MFMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMFM | MFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMFM | MFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.98 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.13 | 2.17 | -2.30 |
Drawdowns
TMFM vs. MFMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFM drawdown since its inception was -31.75%, which is greater than MFMO's maximum drawdown of -12.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFM and MFMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFM | MFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.75% | -12.05% | -19.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.46% | -0.44% | -25.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.86% | -2.41% | -13.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.70% | — | — |
Volatility
TMFM vs. MFMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFM | MFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.59% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.79% | 24.42% | -5.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.63% | 24.42% | -3.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.63% | 24.42% | -3.79% |
TMFM vs. MFMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MFMO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMFM vs. MFMO - Dividend Comparison
TMFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, while MFMO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MFMO Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.06% | 16.27% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFM and MFMO have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MFMO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFMO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFM.
TMFM has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.00% for MFMO.
TMFM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while MFMO is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFM and 0.50% for MFMO.
Find the right allocation for TMFM and MFMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer