TMFM vs. MFMO
TMFM (Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and MFMO (Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool, while MFMO is a Momentum fund actively managed by Motley Fool. Both are actively managed. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TMFM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MFMO.
Performance
TMFM vs. MFMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFM achieves a -5.79% return, which is significantly lower than MFMO's 14.25% return.
TMFM
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- 6M
- -2.45%
- YTD
- -5.79%
- 1Y
- -14.17%
- 3Y*
- 1.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -2.04%
MFMO
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- -6.71%
- 6M
- 11.44%
- YTD
- 14.25%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $209.02K | $305.53K | $328.62K | |
| $157.21K | $169.51K | $230.30K |
TMFM vs. MFMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF | -5.79% | -0.53% |
MFMO Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF | 14.25% | -1.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFM and MFMO is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFM vs. MFMO — Risk / Return Rank
TMFM
MFMO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TMFM vs. MFMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) and Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF (MFMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMFM | MFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMFM vs. MFMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFM drawdown since its inception was -31.75%, which is greater than MFMO's maximum drawdown of -18.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFM and MFMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFM | MFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.75% | -18.23% | -13.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.34% | -12.64% | -10.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.16% | -3.37% | -12.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.51% | — | — |
Volatility
TMFM vs. MFMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFM | MFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.23% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.69% | 29.07% | -9.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.60% | 29.07% | -8.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.60% | 29.07% | -8.47% |
TMFM vs. MFMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MFMO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMFM vs. MFMO - Dividend Comparison
TMFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, while MFMO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MFMO Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.06% | 16.27% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFM and MFMO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MFMO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFMO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFM.
TMFM has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.00% for MFMO.
TMFM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while MFMO is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFM and 0.50% for MFMO.
Find the right allocation for TMFM and MFMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer