TMFM vs. MFIG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TMFM (Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and MFIG (Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool, while MFIG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool Innovative Growth Index. TMFM is actively managed, while MFIG is passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMFM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MFIG.

Performance

TMFM vs. MFIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) and Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFM achieves a -9.50% return, which is significantly lower than MFIG's 4.31% return.

TMFM

• 1D: -1.60%
• 1M: 2.81%
• YTD: -9.50%
• 6M: -11.03%
• 1Y: -18.27%
• 3Y*: 3.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MFIG

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: 6.47%
• YTD: 4.31%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMFM vs. MFIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF	-9.50%	-0.40%
MFIG Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF	4.31%	-0.21%

Correlation

The correlation between TMFM and MFIG is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025	0.73

Return for Risk

TMFM vs. MFIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMFM

TMFM Risk / Return Rank: 2
TMFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
TMFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
TMFM Omega Ratio Rank: 2
TMFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
TMFM Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMFM vs. MFIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) and Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TMFM	MFIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.98	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.38	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.67	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.25	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TMFM	MFIG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.98	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.14	0.53	-0.67

Drawdowns

TMFM vs. MFIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFM drawdown since its inception was -31.75%, which is greater than MFIG's maximum drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFM and MFIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMFM	MFIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.75%	-14.29%	-17.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.34%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.35%	-2.15%	-24.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.85%	-4.63%	-11.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.65%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TMFM	MFIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.99%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.54%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.76%	16.58%	+2.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.63%	16.58%	+4.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.63%	16.58%	+4.05%

TMFM vs. MFIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMFM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MFIG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMFM vs. MFIG - Dividend Comparison

TMFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, while MFIG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
MFIG Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.07%	0.06%	16.27%	2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMFM and MFIG in my portfolio?

TMFM and MFIG have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TMFM or MFIG?

On fees, MFIG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TMFM or MFIG?

MFIG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TMFM or MFIG?

TMFM has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.00% for MFIG.

What is the main difference between TMFM and MFIG?

TMFM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while MFIG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFM and 0.50% for MFIG.